<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Resolution also in
CWE as usual.</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Regards</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Gian Paolo</span>
<br>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">PS 2020 Resolutions
are at </span>
<br><a href="https://cwe.ccsds.org/sls/docs/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2Fsls%2Fdocs%2FSLS%20Area%2FSLS%20Resolutions%2F2020%2DSLS%2DResolutions&View=%7BAE8FB44C%2DE80A%2D42CF%2D8558%2DFB495ABB675F%7D&"><span style=" font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:sans-serif">https://cwe.ccsds.org/sls/docs/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2Fsls%2Fdocs%2FSLS%20Area%2FSLS%20Resolutions%2F2020%2DSLS%2DResolutions&View=%7BAE8FB44C%2DE80A%2D42CF%2D8558%2DFB495ABB675F%7D&</span></a>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#800080;font-family:sans-serif">-----
Forwarded by Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA on 08-05-20 09:59 -----</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">From:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">Enrico.Vassallo@esa.int</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">To:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">sls-rfm@mailman.ccsds.org</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Cc:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"Volk,
Christopher P\(US 335D\)" <christopher.p.volk@jpl.nasa.gov>,
"Border, James S\(US 335D\)" <james.s.border@jpl.nasa.gov></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Date:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">06-05-20
10:47</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Subject:
       </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">[Sls-rfm]
CCSDS RFM WG Spring meeting - comments received on DDOR inputs - status
as of 6 April</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Sent
by:        </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"SLS-RFM"
<sls-rfm-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org></span>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Dear All,</span><span style=" font-size:12pt">
<br>
</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><br>
for what concerns the DDOR input papers (dealing with REC 2.5.7B) to be
discussed at the Spring meeting, the following </span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial">four
sets of comments plus one full input document (SLS-RFM_20-03</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">)
were submitted:</span><span style=" font-size:12pt"> <br>
</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><br>
1. Comments by Wai on adding predistortion in considerings and recommends
<br>
2. Comments by Enrico on several recommends <br>
3. Comments by Shannon and Victor on PN terminology (subset of doc CS_20-03)
<br>
4. Comments by Andrea and Giovanni on several considerings and recommends
<br>
5. ESA input paper SLS-RFM_20-03 on 2 dB vs 1 dB flatness, flexibility
on chip rates, subcarrier frequencies, roll-off factors,  definition
of SRRC shaping </span><span style=" font-size:12pt"><br>
</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><br>
I have agreed with DDOR chair (Jim) the following course of actions:</span><span style=" font-size:12pt">
<br>
</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><br>
A) Prepare and submit a detailed response to all raised issues</span><span style=" font-size:12pt">
</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><br>
B) Prepare and submit the resulting revised version of REC 2.5.7B (and
2.5.6B if alignment needed) </span><span style=" font-size:12pt"><br>
</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><br>
The DDOR WG is trying to finalize tasks A and B. Jim with Christopher and
myself with Dennis already exchanged several emails on this, and assuming
we can reach agreement on 2, these tasks may be completed this week.</span><span style=" font-size:12pt">
</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><br>
I would then give the RFM WG two weeks to make sure we all agree with the
proposed changes and that the authors of the comments are satisfied by
the responses.</span><span style=" font-size:12pt"> </span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><br>
After that, I will initiate agency review of 2.5.7B along with the other
recommendations (as applicable) on freeze since the Fall 2019 meeting.</span><span style=" font-size:12pt">
<br>
</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><br>
There is a catch though. Comments raised by 3 concern several other recommendations
and books, some under C&S WG and two under SLP WG. It would be wise
to study the proposal also from an overall impact point of view and take
a global SLS area decision at the next face-to-face meeting in Toulouse.</span><span style=" font-size:12pt">
</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><br>
With the normal CCSDS timeline, the agency review of 2.5.7B will most likely
terminate shortly before the Toulouse meeting where RIDs disposition will
take place. I propose that we consider the changes stemming from discussion
of input 3, if any, as editorials so that we can insert them in Toulouse
before sending the recommendation out for publication.</span><span style=" font-size:12pt">
<br>
</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><br>
I noted that the C&S WG chair recommended the same path for item 3
and that also DDOR WG chair agreed to this.</span><span style=" font-size:12pt">
<br>
</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><br>
Please let me know if you have problems with the proposed way forward.</span><span style=" font-size:12pt">
<br>
</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><br>
Regards, Enrico</span><span style=" font-size:12pt"> </span>
<br><tt><span style=" font-size:12pt">This message is intended only for
the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or<br>
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination
is prohibited. If you have received<br>
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies
appropriate organisational measures to protect<br>
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA
Data Protection Officer (dpo@esa.int).<br>
</span></tt><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">_______________________________________________<br>
SLS-RFM mailing list<br>
SLS-RFM@mailman.ccsds.org<br>
</span></tt><a href="https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sls-rfm"><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sls-rfm</span></tt></a><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br>
</span></tt>
<br><PRE>This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo@esa.int).
</PRE>