<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;
panose-1:2 11 0 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Times New Roman \(Body CS\)";
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:11.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#467886" vlink="#96607D" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Dear Ignacio and SLP WG,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Attached are the pink sheets to extend the AOS Version 2 Spacecraft ID (SCID) from the current 8 to 10 bits.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">This extension is critical, since SANA has informed us all that there are no more Version 2 SCIDs available for assignment for new missions.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Recall that the SLP WG conducted a telecon on this subject a few months ago. The result of that telecon was to see if there was some hope to recycle some of the existing V2 SCIDs if analysis could demonstrate
that possibility. Since then, both NASA and UKSA came to the same conclusion that there are too many collisions to share those SCIDs. Therefore, the conclusion the SLP WG agreed to several months ago was to proceed with the SCID extension via pink sheets.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">The secretariat has responded very timely and produced the attached pink sheets based upon the SLP WG input. All the other pending changes to the AOS SDLP (732.0) have already been captured before (e.g., FHEC
field). So we haven’t lost any updated information in the document. However, the secretariat has informed me that the SLP WG and Ignacio will need to agree to move these pink sheets forward
<i><span style="background:yellow;mso-highlight:yellow">before the end of this week</span></i> so that this SCID extension change can be included in the Agency Review that will be requested as a consequence of our Fall 2024 CCSDS meeting in London.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Therefore, I am asking both Ignacio and the SLP WG to review the attached pink sheets and to let me and the CCSDS Secretariat know if you find any issues with them. If none are received, then we should go
forward in putting these pink sheets into the Agency Review package for this AOS Space Data Link Protocol.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Best regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">Greg<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt">SLP WG Chair<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>