<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">For info,</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Enrico</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#800080;font-family:sans-serif">-----
Forwarded by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA on 17/02/21 08:38 -----</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">From:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"CCSDS
Secretariat" <thomas.gannett@tgannett.net></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">To:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">cesg-all@mailman.ccsds.org</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Date:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">16/02/21
20:13</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Subject:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">[Cesg-all]
Results of CESG Poll closing 15 February 2021</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Sent
by: </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"CESG-All"
<cesg-all-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org></span>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2021-01-002
<br>
Approval to release CCSDS 883.0-R-1, Spacecraft <br>
Onboard Interface Services—High Data Rate <br>
Wireless Proximity Network Communications (Red <br>
Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review<br>
Results of CESG poll beginning 25 January 2021 and ending 15 February 2021:<br>
<br>
Abstain: 0
(0%) Approve <br>
Unconditionally: 4 (80%) (Barkley, Burleigh, Wilmot, He)<br>
Approve with Conditions: 1 (20%) (Shames)<br>
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)<br>
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:<br>
<br>
Erik Barkley (Approve Unconditionally): A <br>
minor editorial clean-up request: can column <br>
headers be provided for Table 2-1? It appears <br>
that the columns are along the lines "activity" <br>
and "data communication need" (or type) -- assuming my guess
is correct.<br>
<br>
Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions): I <br>
am concerned that there appear to be a number of <br>
loose ends in regard the following: SFCG approval <br>
of frequency band use, end-to-end protocol <br>
diagrams (fig 2-5 & 2-6) that show IP end-to-end <br>
out to Lunar distances instead of DTN, and the <br>
specifics of the SANA registries that are <br>
weak. I strongly believe that these have to be <br>
fixed before the document can be published, but <br>
they may be acceptable at this point of release for agency review.<br>
<br>
<br>
Total Respondents: 5<br>
<br>
No response was received from the following Area(s):<br>
<br>
MOIMS<br>
SLS<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions<br>
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
<br>
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed<br>
<br>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CESG-All mailing list<br>
CESG-All@mailman.ccsds.org<br>
</span></tt><a href="https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all"><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt">https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all</span></tt></a><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br>
</span></tt>
<br><PRE>This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo@esa.int).
</PRE>