<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Dear All,</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">by the deadline
of Oct 19, the following set of comments were provided in writing and therefore
will be considered by the WG:</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">1. Comments to
SLS-RFM_20-02
by NASA</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">2. Comments to
SLS-RFM_20-06
by ESA</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">3. Comments to
SLS-RFM_20-07
by NASA</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">4. Comments to
SLS-RFM_20-09
by ESA</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">5. Proposed reply
on CCSDS 883.0-BBv1
by chair and deputy chair</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">6. Comments to
proposed reply on CCSDS 883.0-BBv1 by
CNES</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">7. Comments to
CCSDS 883.0-BBv1
by NASA</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Comments 1-3 are
all of clarification nature and could be addressed by a reply by the authors
of the document or by an updated document. Authors may do this by Oct 26
or by taking an action item for next meeting.</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Would the authors
of these 3 documents indicate the preferred way forward?</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Comments 4 concern
a recommendation proposed to go to agency review so they should be answered
before we proceed further. I am kindly asking Dennis to indicate by when
he could reply and provide an updated recommendation version.</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Document 5 has
already been updated with relevant text from document 6 focusing on SFCG
and frequencies, and would be ready for submission to SOIS. However, the
comments in document 7 would sort of block the CCSDS process of SOIS by
requesting inputs to RFM WG.</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">This is a sensitive
issue. Since the comments were generated by NASA, SOIS chair is from NASA,
and some exchanges took place between SOIS chair and SLS RFM deputy chair
also from NASA, I would kindly ask NASA to suggest an acceptable way forward
to the RFM WG by Oct 26 latest.</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">More info on this
but also on the other documents and on the on-going agency review (deadline
for RIDs is today) can be seen in the attachment, which is a living document
until it is approved by the WG at the end of next week.</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Should you also
have different interpretations from me on the input documents disposition
in the attachment, please feel free to let me know by Oct 26.</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">The way I see
the received WG inputs and comments, I think we can proceed by correspondence
and avoid the teleconf tentatively planned for Oct 29. Of course, I need
to see if more RIDs are submitted to the agency review before the end of
the day and if they invalidate my reasoning.</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Please let me
have your views on my proposed disposition and reply on the planning questions
I raised.</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Regards, Enrico</span>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#800080;font-family:sans-serif">-----
Forwarded by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA on 19/10/20 16:05 -----</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">From:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">Enrico
Vassallo/esoc/ESA</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">To:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">sls-rfm@mailman.ccsds.org</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Date:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">13/10/20
13:29</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Subject:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">RFM
input papers list for Fall 2020</span>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Please submit
your comments in writing to the inputs latest <b><u>by Oct 19</u></b>.</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Regards, Enrico</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">[attachment "SLS-RFM
(Fall 2020 Input Papers List) i1.0.docx" deleted by Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA]
</span>
<br>
<br><PRE>This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo@esa.int).
</PRE>