<font size=2 face="sans-serif">Tom,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">the editorial change agreement involved
ESA, NASA, DLR, FSA, CNSA that were present at the meeting. Only one of
the agencies contributing (or that contributed in the past) to RFM was
not present.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Submitting 10 recs with editorial changes
only to agency review is a waste of the scarce resources we have. However,
I agree with you that adding two recommends even if void of specs changes
the perception.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I want to try demoting these changes
to non-normative footnotes. If I succeed and the WG agrees with me, we
can proceed as I prefer otherwise we go along with your proposal.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Regards, Enrico</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"Thomas Gannett"
<thomas.gannett@tgannett.net></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><Enrico.Vassallo@esa.int>,
<Gian.Paolo.Calzolari@esa.int></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Cc:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"'Lee, Dennis
K \(332G\)'" <dennis.k.lee@jpl.nasa.gov>, "'Gilles Moury'"
<Gilles.Moury@cnes.fr>, <sls-rfm@mailman.ccsds.org></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">25/05/2017 17:03</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">RE: Revised
recs on TTFRs</font>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 color=#004080 face="Calibri">Since the proposed changes
appear to be instigated or at least inspired by the new draft recommendation
2.6.11A, which needs to go to agency review, it seems to me to be entirely
appropriate to include the changed pages in that review. If there is rationale
for not allowing the agencies to review the changes, when they have to
review 2.6.11A anyway, it eludes me. I think sometimes people forget that
the CCSDS is made up of eleven member agencies (not just ESA and/or NASA)
and that it is a consensus organization. </font>
<br><font size=2 color=#004080 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=3 color=#004080 face="Times New Roman"> </font>
<br><font size=3 color=#004080 face="Times New Roman">Thomas Gannett</font>
<br><font size=3 color=#004080 face="Times New Roman">thomas.gannett@tgannett.net</font>
<br><font size=3 color=#004080 face="Times New Roman">+1 443 472 0805</font>
<br><font size=2 color=#004080 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Tahoma"><b>From:</b> Enrico.Vassallo@esa.int [</font><a href=mailto:Enrico.Vassallo@esa.int><font size=2 face="Tahoma">mailto:Enrico.Vassallo@esa.int</font></a><font size=2 face="Tahoma">]
<b><br>
Sent:</b> Thursday, May 25, 2017 8:58 AM<b><br>
To:</b> Gian.Paolo.Calzolari@esa.int<b><br>
Cc:</b> Lee, Dennis K (332G); Gilles Moury; sls-rfm@mailman.ccsds.org;
Tom Gannett<b><br>
Subject:</b> Re: Revised recs on TTFRs</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> </font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">I will work something out next
Monday.</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"> </font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">Rgds<br>
<br>
Enrico's phone</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><br>
On May 24, 2017, at 22:56, Gian Paolo Calzolari <</font><a href=mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari@esa.int><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><u>Gian.Paolo.Calzolari@esa.int</u></font></a><font size=3 face="Times New Roman">>
wrote:</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><br>
</font><font size=2 face="Courier New"><br>
Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA wrote on 24/05/2017 08:51:21:<br>
<br>
> Do I take it that you do not want to include the 10 editorially <br>
> revised recs on TTFRs but want do an agency review on them? </font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><br>
</font><font size=2 face="Courier New"><br>
Enrico, <br>
as you know the CCSDS Editor has already stated that the current formulation
does not fit for the Editorial Corrigendum but rather for Agency Review
due (mainly [IMHO]) to the two new recommended requirements.</font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><br>
</font><font size=2 face="Courier New"><br>
> <br>
> I could propose to the WG to remove the two additional considerings
<br>
> and recommends and add a generic footnote about digital <br>
> implementation if this can avoid agency review of editorials !!! Of
<br>
> course, this would have to be done also for the new rec just approved
for AR.<br>
> <br>
> Please advise, Enrico <br>
> </font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><br>
</font><font size=2 face="Courier New"><br>
I guess that in case the additions can be converted to a NON normative
NOTE/paragraph the Editorial Corrigendum can be tried.<br>
Tom, copied here, may suggest the best (and fastest) form for it (if WG
agrees).</font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><br>
</font><font size=2 face="Courier New"><br>
Regards</font><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><br>
</font><font size=2 face="Courier New"><br>
Gian Paolo</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">This message and any attachments are
intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination
or copying (either in whole or in part) of its</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">content is not permitted.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">If you received this message in error,
please notify the sender and delete it from your system.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">Emails can be altered and their integrity
cannot be guaranteed by the sender.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">Please consider the environment before
printing this email.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New">This message and any attachments are
intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.<br>
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole
or in part) of its<br>
content is not permitted.<br>
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete
it from your system.<br>
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.<br>
<br>
Please consider the environment before printing this email.<br>
<br>
</font>
<br>
<br><PRE>This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
</PRE>