<font size=2 face="sans-serif">Tom should have fixed this problem in 2010.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The ball is with him.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Please stop involving RFM WG on this.
If anything is needed, do it at SLS or CESG level.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Cheers, Enrico</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#800080 face="sans-serif">----- Forwarded by Enrico
Vassallo/esoc/ESA on 12/10/2016 12:15 -----</font>
<br>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">tomg@aiaa.org</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Cc:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"Jean-luc Gerner"
<jeanluc.gerner@yahoo.com>, "Moury Gilles" <gilles.moury@cnes.fr></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">13/08/2010 10:30</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: Status of
CCSDS books</font>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Tom,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I reviewed the documents under my two
groups. I have the following comments:</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">1) 413.0-G-1 It's
obsolete and replaced by G-2 and therefore I think it should disappear
from the list (for instance we have 401.0-B-20 but not all 19 previous
issues listed.)</font>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">2) 421.0-G-1, B20.0-Y-1, B20.0-Y-2
</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">These are proceedings from 1989, 1993
and 2001. I am not sure what is the lifetime plan for proceedings. For
sure they do not need reconfirmation review. I would be inclined to keep
them on the list as current since proceedings never become obsolete, and
remove the next action and its date. Also the responsibility should be
transferred to secretariat. However, I am happy to discuss this proposal
if rules exist also for proceedings.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Sorry for the delay in my response,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Enrico</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA@ESA</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Cc:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"Tom Gannett"
<thomas.gannett@tgannett.net>, "Gilles Moury" <Gilles.Moury@cnes.fr>,
sls-rfm@mailman.ccsds.org</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">12/10/2016 11:46</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: B20.0-Y-1
/ Any re-action expected</font>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Enrico,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> I
am sure it will never change.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I was just wondering whether there is
a need for e.g. a WG Resolution to finally/definitively put the next action
date to year 3000 :o)</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Regards</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Gian Paolo</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA@ESA</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Cc:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"Tom Gannett"
<thomas.gannett@tgannett.net>, "Gilles Moury" <Gilles.Moury@cnes.fr>,
sls-rfm@mailman.ccsds.org</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">12/10/2016 11:44</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Re: B20.0-Y-1
/ Any re-action expected</font>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">This is a collection of input papers.
It cannot be changed !!!!</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">We told this to the CCSDS World many
times already. Please stop this proliferation of useless information.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Regards, Enrico</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"Tom Gannett"
<thomas.gannett@tgannett.net></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Cc:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"Gilles Moury"
<Gilles.Moury@cnes.fr>, Enrico Vassallo/esoc/ESA@ESA</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">12/10/2016 11:38</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">B20.0-Y-1 /
Any re-action expected</font>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Tom,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> do
you need any (re)action from the WG to state that this book is going to
stay as is?</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Thanks</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Gian Paolo</font>
<br>
<br><img src=cid:_1_0A03848C0A0382200038D8A5C125804A style="border:0px solid;">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><PRE>This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
</PRE>