<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>All,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>We concluded reviewing the RIDs received on BPv7 in the SIS-DTN meeting today. The proposed resolutions are captured in this <a href="https://cwe.ccsds.org/sis/docs/SIS-DTN/Draft%20Documents/BPv7%20for%20CCSDS/Agency%20Review%20June%202023/Copy%20of%20BPv7%20Agency%20Review%20RIDS%2020230823.xlsx?d=wd3de488ebe0f4eea9922091a25f8c843">spreadsheet</a> on the CWE site. Please review these as soon as possible, as we will soon begin to revise the document according to these decisions. Please express any concerns or qualms ASAP so that we don’t face rework. If you can assist with document editing to incorporate these decisions, please let me know. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks! <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Next week (8/31), assuming a quorum of interested parties is on the call, we will have a discussion of the timestamp/sequence discussion, with a consolidated summary of positions and comments expressed to date shared by GSFC (Jonathan’s action).<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Also, we have approval for the Multipoint Delivery Orange Book project. I am hoping to get the “high-performance retransmission protocol” (or whatever we end up calling it) Orange Book chartered soon, as well. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>We should start to figure out what our agenda will be for the Fall in-person meetings, and identify who expects to be in attendance, given the coincidence with the IETF meetings.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks all.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Best regards,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Bob<o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>