<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>All,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Below find the draft resolutions that I referred to in our report to the SIS Area Director. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I realize that many WG members are traveling back home from the meetings, as am I, and that there are undoubtedly many competing priorities upon your return. However, I request that you look carefully at these and communicate any non-concurrence to me as soon as possible. While CCSDS doesn’t require unanimity to proceed, it does operate on consensus. To that end, if there is something that I have said below that *<b>doesn’t</b>* reflect the consensus of the working group, please let me know as soon as possible.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Also, to charter an Orange Book for the BPv7 Multi-Destination capability, we will need to have a lead agency (presumably NASA) and a resource estimate in staff months for the WG’s part of the effort. This should include document preparation, prototype development, additional agency technical contributions, and WG review and comment (but not including secretariat editorial support). I’m assuming/hoping that this can be completed in 4-6 staff-months and within 7 calendar months (6/1/2023-12/31/2023). Please give me your thoughts on this. The CCSDS “Reference” cost model is shown in the table below – it doesn’t directly address Orange Book preparation, but I based my 4-6 sm estimate on this model.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Here are the draft resolutions:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-GB>BPSec Agency Review<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB>SIS_DTN-R-2023-05-001: The CCSDS SIS DTN WG, having reached consensus internally and with the CCSDS SEA Security WG that the DTN Bundle Security Protocol is ready to proceed to agency review, resolves to submit the attached to the SIS Area Director for review, and upon approval, submission to the CESG for polling and CCSDS Member Agency approval.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-GB>Charter DTN Multi-Destination Orange Book Project<o:p></o:p></span></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><o:p> </o:p></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB>SIS_DTN-R-2023-05-002: The CCSDS SIS DTN WG, having determined 1) that efficient multi-destination delivery of BPv7 traffic is critical to upcoming missions and 2) that an Experimental Protocol meets the immediate need to test and validate the proposed protocol mechanisms and recognizing 3) that a Recommended Standard may follow at a future date to validate interagency interoperability, resolves to request that the SIS Area Director request chartering a project for development of a DTN BPv7 Multi-Destination Delivery capability to be specified initially in a CCSDS Orange Book, with the anticipated project date of 6/1/2023, the anticipated project completion date of 12/31/2023, and agency participation led by NASA and supported by ESA.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b>Further Resolutions anticipated in the next 6 months:<o:p></o:p></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=DE><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=DE>Reaffirm LTP with the Technical Corrigendum under review within the WG<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=DE><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=DE>Approve Compressed Bundle Status Orange Book and DTN Multi-Destination Orange Book for publication</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Here is the CCSDS “Cost Model”:<o:p></o:p></p><table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 width="100%" style='width:100.0%'><tr><td colspan=2 valign=top style='border:none;border-top:solid #D8D8D8 1.0pt;padding:2.25pt 4.5pt 3.0pt 4.5pt'><p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><b><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:black;mso-ligatures:none'>Cost Model Assumptions / Resource Allocation Guidelines</span></b><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:black;mso-ligatures:none'><o:p></o:p></span></p></td></tr><tr><td width=630 valign=top style='width:472.2pt;border:none;border-top:solid #D8D8D8 1.0pt;background:#EBF3FF;padding:2.25pt 4.5pt 3.0pt 4.5pt'><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><b><span style='font-size:9.5pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:black;mso-ligatures:none'>Complex Standard Assumptions</span></b><span style='font-size:9.5pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:black;mso-ligatures:none'><br>Book Editor<br>- GB 6 mm<br>- BB 10 mm<br>- MB 8 mm<br>Prototype 1: 8 mm<br>Prototype 2: 8 mm<br>WG Chair 2 mm<br>Technical Contributor 1 mm each (Minimum 2 Contributors)<br>Technical Monitor 1 mm each (Minimum 2 Monitors)<o:p></o:p></span></p></td><td width=630 valign=top style='width:472.2pt;border:none;border-top:solid #D8D8D8 1.0pt;background:#EBF3FF;padding:2.25pt 4.5pt 3.0pt 4.5pt'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:9.5pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:black;mso-ligatures:none'>Normal Standard Assumptions</span></b><span style='font-size:9.5pt;font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;color:black;mso-ligatures:none'><br>Book Editor<br>- GB 4 mm<br>- BB 6 mm<br>- MB 6 mm<br>Prototype 1: 3 mm<br>Prototype 2: 3 mm<br>WG Chair 2 mm<br>Technical Contributor 1 mm each (Minimum 1 Contributor)<o:p></o:p></span></p></td></tr></table><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I would appreciate your thoughts on these items as soon as possible. Many thanks!<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Best regards,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Bob<o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>