<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Lloyd Wood wrote:
<blockquote
cite="midPine.GSO.4.50.0510052116390.4882-100000@argos.ee.surrey.ac.uk"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Scott Burleigh wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">That's my reading of the paper too. The two sentences in which
"CFDP" appears both talk about the performance deficiencies of the
implementation (and, in one case, the deficiencies of the
implementation of TCP as well).
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->The paper does not discuss TCP implementations. The paper discusses
the design of TCP not being suitable for the scenario.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Yeah, I guess it depends on how you parse the words "This protocol
gives smaller code footprint size and increased performance when
compared with TCP and with an earlier implementation of the CCSDS File
Delivery Protocol (CFDP) written within SSTL." Since code footprint
size and increased performance are not aspects of protocol design, it
seemed reasonable to me to conclude that what was being discussed in
this sentence was implementations of these protocols. A small point in
any case.<br>
<br>
Scott<br>
</body>
</html>