<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Last of the four unresolved RIDs:<br>
<blockquote>
  <p class="MsoPlainText">Rename "Memo" field in MAMS PDU as
"Primary Data" field to better indicate its purpose and relationship to
"Supplementary
Data" field.<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
My proposed disposition is this:<br>
<blockquote><span
 style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;;">Not accepted.<span
 style="">&nbsp;
  </span>&#8220;Primary Data&#8221; does not better indicate the purpose of this
field, nor
its relationship to the &#8220;Supplementary Data&#8221; field.</span><br>
  <span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;;"></span></blockquote>
<span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;;">We
probably shouldn't invest a lot of time in this one, as it is nothing
but word-smithery.&nbsp; My point is that "Primary Data" actually doesn't
say anything useful about the purpose of this field -- only that it's
"primary" with respect to the (not always present) "Supplementary Data"
field.&nbsp; In a sense it comes back to my complaint that the word "data"
is so overloaded that it doesn't connote anything at all, which it why
I prefer the marginally less insipid "Memo".<br>
<br>
Scott<br>
</span>
</body>
</html>