<font size=2 face="Arial">FYI: The TCP/IP binding has passed CESG poll
and will go to CMC poll to agree agency review.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">Regards,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">__Mario</font>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-07-001 <br>
Approval to release CCSDS 524.2-R-1, Mission <br>
Operations—Message Abstraction Layer Binding to <br>
TCP/IP Transport and Split Binary Encoding (Red <br>
Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review<br>
Results of CESG poll beginning 18 July 2016 and ending 28 July 2016:<br>
<br>
Abstain:
1 (20%) (Calzolari)<br>
Approve Unconditionally: 4 (80%) (Merri, Behal, Scott, Barton)<br>
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%)<br>
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)<br>
<br>
Total Respondents: 5<br>
No response was received from the following Area(s):<br>
<br>
SEA<br>
CSS<br>
<br>
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally<br>
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
CMC poll</font></tt>
<br><font size=1 color=#800080 face="sans-serif">----- Forwarded by Mario
Merri/esoc/ESA on 01/08/2016 09:40 -----</font>
<br>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"Thomas Gannett"
<thomas.gannett@tgannett.net></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cesg-all@mailman.ccsds.org</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">29/07/2016 22:11</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">[Cesg-all] Results
of CESG Polls closing 28 July 2016</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Sent by:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"CESG-All"
<cesg-all-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org></font>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><font size=2>CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-06-001 <br>
Approval to release CCSDS 732.1-R-1, Unified <br>
Space Link Protocol (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review<br>
Results of CESG poll beginning 30 June 2016 and ending 28 July 2016:<br>
<br>
Abstain:
0 (0%)<br>
Approve Unconditionally: 7 (87.5%) (Barkley, <br>
Merri, Behal, Scott, Calzolari, Moury, Barton)<br>
Approve with Conditions: 1 (12.5%) (Shames)<br>
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)<br>
<br>
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:<br>
<br>
Erik Barkley (Approve Unconditionally): No <br>
conditions, but to note (can be considered as part of agency review):<br>
<br>
1) Section 2.2.2.7 -- states that there are three <br>
cases of periodic transfer service, but lists only two<br>
<br>
2) Managed parameters -- where possible, suggest <br>
that ranges/min-max information be supplied; eg., <br>
I doubt that insert zone of gigabits is practical<br>
<br>
3) In the registry section, suggest revising to <br>
just report the facts; ie statements like "If you <br>
make those two changes, then the existing registries and the Space Link<br>
Identifiers Registry will be consistent.." are <br>
speculative at best. My understanding is that the <br>
WG is to work with SANA to arrive at the set of <br>
registries and/or registry modifications needed <br>
prior to agency review. In other words, a <br>
matter-of-fact statement of what the registries <br>
are and what the maintenance rules are (in conformance with RMP).<br>
<br>
Peter Shames (Approve with Conditions): In <br>
reading thru this document I have found a number <br>
of editorial issues, but for the most part the <br>
document is in pretty good shape. Most of the <br>
identified issues are about clarity and <br>
presentation, but there are a few editorial issues as well.<br>
<br>
Much of the complexity is due to covering both <br>
fixed and variable length frames and both TC & TM <br>
coding and synch approaches. Likewise the <br>
inclusion of both COP-1 and COP-P adds complexity <br>
that could be further worked. I am assuming that <br>
a book of this complexity and impact may well go <br>
through more than one Red Book review, so the WG <br>
may wish to send it out in its current form to <br>
gather a broader set of inputs before tackling these issues.<br>
<br>
This is a revised submission following a review of the complete document.<br>
<br>
Keith Scott (Approve Unconditionally): Attached <br>
are some comments that identify mostly editorial <br>
issues. I believe that in one case the service <br>
spec for one of the services is missing (?) as well.<br>
<br>
The attached are comments and need not be <br>
addressed prior to releasing the document for <br>
agency review. I will submit RIDS during agency <br>
review for any serious issues I find.<br>
<br>
--keith<br>
<br>
<br>
Total Respondents: 8<br>
All Areas responded to this question.<br>
<br>
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions<br>
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
<br>
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed<br>
<br>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>
<br>
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-07-001 <br>
Approval to release CCSDS 524.2-R-1, Mission <br>
Operations—Message Abstraction Layer Binding to <br>
TCP/IP Transport and Split Binary Encoding (Red <br>
Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency review<br>
Results of CESG poll beginning 18 July 2016 and ending 28 July 2016:<br>
<br>
Abstain:
1 (20%) (Calzolari)<br>
Approve Unconditionally: 4 (80%) (Merri, Behal, Scott, Barton)<br>
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%)<br>
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)<br>
<br>
Total Respondents: 5<br>
No response was received from the following Area(s):<br>
<br>
SEA<br>
CSS<br>
<br>
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally<br>
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
CMC poll<br>
<br>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>
<br>
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-07-002 <br>
Approval to release CCSDS 356.0-R-1, Network <br>
Layer Security Adaptation Profile (Red Book, Issue 1) for CCSDS Agency
review<br>
Results of CESG poll beginning 18 July 2016 and ending 28 July 2016:<br>
<br>
Abstain:
0 (0%)<br>
Approve Unconditionally: 5 (83.33%) (Behal, Scott, Calzolari,
Moury, Barton)<br>
Approve with Conditions: 1 (16.67%) (Merri)<br>
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)<br>
<br>
CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:<br>
<br>
Mario Merri (Approve with Conditions): Annex A:<br>
1) it is indicated that this Annex is "to be <br>
supplied". I guess this should happen before the <br>
requested Agency Review. Please provide it.<br>
<br>
2) Typo: confromance->conformance<br>
<br>
<br>
Total Respondents: 6<br>
No response was received from the following Area(s):<br>
<br>
SEA<br>
CSS<br>
<br>
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions<br>
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
<br>
CMC poll after conditions have been addressed<br>
<br>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>
<br>
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-07-003 <br>
Approval to publish CCSDS 911.1-B-4, Space Link <br>
Extension—Return All Frames Service Specification (Blue Book, Issue 4)<br>
Results of CESG poll beginning 18 July 2016 and ending 28 July 2016:<br>
<br>
Abstain:
0 (0%)<br>
Approve Unconditionally: 6 (100%) (Barkley, <br>
Merri, Behal, Scott, Cola, Barton)<br>
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%)<br>
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)<br>
<br>
Total Respondents: 6<br>
No response was received from the following Area(s):<br>
<br>
SEA<br>
SLS<br>
<br>
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally<br>
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
CMC poll<br>
<br>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>
<br>
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-07-004 <br>
Approval to publish CCSDS 911.2-B-3, Space Link <br>
Extension—Return Channel Frames Service Specification (Blue Book, Issue
3)<br>
Results of CESG poll beginning 18 July 2016 and ending 28 July 2016:<br>
<br>
Abstain:
0 (0%)<br>
Approve Unconditionally: 6 (100%) (Barkley, <br>
Merri, Behal, Scott, Calzolari, Barton)<br>
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%)<br>
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)<br>
<br>
Total Respondents: 6<br>
No response was received from the following Area(s):<br>
<br>
SEA<br>
<br>
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally<br>
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
CMC poll<br>
<br>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>
<br>
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-07-005 <br>
Approval to publish CCSDS 911.5-B-3, Space Link <br>
Extension—Return Operational Control Fields <br>
Service Specification (Blue Book, Issue 3)<br>
Results of CESG poll beginning 18 July 2016 and ending 28 July 2016:<br>
<br>
Abstain:
0 (0%)<br>
Approve Unconditionally: 6 (100%) (Barkley, <br>
Merri, Behal, Scott, Calzolari, Barton)<br>
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%)<br>
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)<br>
<br>
Total Respondents: 6<br>
No response was received from the following Area(s):<br>
<br>
SEA<br>
<br>
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally<br>
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
CMC poll<br>
<br>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>
<br>
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-07-006 <br>
Approval to publish CCSDS 912.1-B-4, Space Link <br>
Extension—Forward CLTU Service Specification (Blue Book, Issue 4)<br>
Results of CESG poll beginning 18 July 2016 and ending 28 July 2016:<br>
<br>
Abstain:
0 (0%)<br>
Approve Unconditionally: 6 (100%) (Barkley, <br>
Merri, Behal, Scott, Calzolari, Barton)<br>
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%)<br>
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)<br>
<br>
Total Respondents: 6<br>
No response was received from the following Area(s):<br>
<br>
SEA<br>
<br>
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally<br>
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
CMC poll<br>
<br>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>
<br>
CESG E-Poll Identifier: CESG-P-2016-07-007 <br>
Approval to publish CCSDS 912.3-B-3, Space Link <br>
Extension—Forward Space Packet Service Specification (Blue Book, Issue
3)<br>
Results of CESG poll beginning 18 July 2016 and ending 28 July 2016:<br>
<br>
Abstain:
0 (0%)<br>
Approve Unconditionally: 6 (100%) (Barkley, <br>
Merri, Behal, Scott, Calzolari, Barton)<br>
Approve with Conditions: 0 (0%)<br>
Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)<br>
<br>
Total Respondents: 6<br>
No response was received from the following Area(s):<br>
<br>
SEA<br>
<br>
SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved Unconditionally<br>
PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Generate
CMC poll<br>
<br>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>
<br>
<br>
Thomas Gannett<br>
thomas.gannett@tgannett.net<br>
+1 443 472 0805 <br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CESG-All mailing list<br>
CESG-All@mailman.ccsds.org<br>
</font></tt><a href="https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all"><tt><font size=2>https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2><br>
</font></tt>
<br><PRE>This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
</PRE>