[Moims-rac] Update to Charter and version 0 White Book

[Giaretta, DL (David)]

Plus homework!
 
..David


________________________________

	From: moims-rac-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org
[mailto:moims-rac-bounces at mailman.ccsds.org] On Behalf Of Mark Conrad
	Sent: 19 May 2008 15:41
	To: moims-rac at mailman.ccsds.org
	Subject: RE: [Moims-rac] Update to Charter and version 0 White
Book
	
	
	David,
	 
	Do you know that we are working for 90 minutes each week these
days and starting 30 minutes earlier than we used to?
	 
	Mark
	
	>>> D.L.Giaretta at rl.ac.uk 5/19/2008 10:21 AM >>>
	
	AH-ha - I made up the second document title, based on the title
of ISO27006 which we looked at in Washington. I thought we all seemed
rerasonably convinced that we needed something like that. ISO27006 is
mostly "boilerplate" that would apply to any audit/certification. There
was a brief lists of some specific skills and experience that would be
useful. There was also a reference to some appropriate qualification
that auditors should have.
	 
	..David


________________________________

		From: Mark Conrad [mailto:mark.conrad at nara.gov] 
		Sent: 19 May 2008 15:00
		To: MOIMS-Repository Audit and Certification BOF;
Giaretta, DL (David)
		Subject: Re: [Moims-rac] Update to Charter and version 0
White Book
		
		
		David,
		 
		I have made several comments on the revised charter on
the wiki.
		 
		I could not find the "Requirements for Bodies Providing
Audit and Certification of Digital Repositories".  Is it on the wiki
somewhere?
		 
		The White Book - version 0 contains some of our markup
from commenting on the input document. A number of the requirements only
contain the following text:
	
************************************************************************
***********************************
Supporting Text
<http://wiki.digitalrepositoryauditandcertification.org/bin/view/Main/Co
mbinedWithNewTemplate?template=viewprint&amp;sortcol=0;table=267;up=0#so
rted_table>  

		Mandatory text that applies to all repositories goes in
this section. The text should have pairs of sentences for each mandatory
requirement or sub-requirement found in the supporting text of the
existing document. The sentence pairs should begin with the phrases,
"The repository must..." and This is necessary in order to..." . 

		The repository must ... 

		This is necessary in order to ... 

Examples of Ways the Repository can Demonstrate it is Meeting this
Requirement
<http://wiki.digitalrepositoryauditandcertification.org/bin/view/Main/Co
mbinedWithNewTemplate?template=viewprint&amp;sortcol=0;table=268;up=0#so
rted_table>  

		Text found in the Evidence section of the current TRAC
document goes here. 

		... 

Discussion
<http://wiki.digitalrepositoryauditandcertification.org/bin/view/Main/Co
mbinedWithNewTemplate?template=viewprint&amp;sortcol=0;table=269;up=0#so
rted_table>  

		Text found in the supporting text section of the current
TRAC document that does not apply to all repositories goes here. 

	
************************************************************************
***********************************

		Is this sufficient for the initial version of the White
Book?

		 

		Mark



		>
		 
		Mark Conrad
		Electronic Records Archives (ERA)
		NHER 
		The National Archives and Records Administration
		Building 494 Second Floor
		310 State Route 956
		Rocket Center, WV  26726
		 
		Phone: 304-726-7820
		Fax: 304-726-7815
		Email: mark.conrad at nara.gov 
		ERA Website: http://www.archives.gov/era/>>
D.L.Giaretta at rl.ac.uk 5/19/2008 5:38 AM >>>
		
		I've revised the charter on the WIki to be in line with
CCSDS expectations - in particular specifying a Magenta Book - see
http://wiki.digitalrepositoryauditandcertification.org/bin/view/Main/Rac
Charter
		 
		I've also added the "Requirements for Bodies Providing
Audit and Certification of Digital Repositories" which we spoke about in
Washington - based on examination of how other related standards link to
the audit and certification process e.g. ISO 27006.
		.
		I've also taken a snapshot of the Wiki and created a
CCSDS White Book - version 0 - see
http://wiki.digitalrepositoryauditandcertification.org/bin/viewfile/Main
/WebHome?rev=1;filename=MetricsForDigitalRepositoryAuditAndCertification
WBv0.doc
		 
		If these look OK I'll submit to CCSDS tomorrow to
complete the creation of the Working Group. 
		 
		..David

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-rac/attachments/20080519/34a7f63e/attachment-0001.htm