[Moims-rac] Update to Charter and version 0 White Book

[Giaretta, DL (David)]

AH-ha - I made up the second document title, based on the title of
ISO27006 which we looked at in Washington. I thought we all seemed
rerasonably convinced that we needed something like that. ISO27006 is
mostly "boilerplate" that would apply to any audit/certification. There
was a brief lists of some specific skills and experience that would be
useful. There was also a reference to some appropriate qualification
that auditors should have.
 
..David


________________________________

	From: Mark Conrad [mailto:mark.conrad at nara.gov] 
	Sent: 19 May 2008 15:00
	To: MOIMS-Repository Audit and Certification BOF; Giaretta, DL
(David)
	Subject: Re: [Moims-rac] Update to Charter and version 0 White
Book
	
	
	David,
	 
	I have made several comments on the revised charter on the wiki.
	 
	I could not find the "Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit
and Certification of Digital Repositories".  Is it on the wiki
somewhere?
	 
	The White Book - version 0 contains some of our markup from
commenting on the input document. A number of the requirements only
contain the following text:
	
************************************************************************
***********************************
Supporting Text
<http://wiki.digitalrepositoryauditandcertification.org/bin/view/Main/Co
mbinedWithNewTemplate?template=viewprint&amp;sortcol=0;table=267;up=0#so
rted_table>  

	Mandatory text that applies to all repositories goes in this
section. The text should have pairs of sentences for each mandatory
requirement or sub-requirement found in the supporting text of the
existing document. The sentence pairs should begin with the phrases,
"The repository must..." and This is necessary in order to..." . 

	The repository must ... 

	This is necessary in order to ... 

Examples of Ways the Repository can Demonstrate it is Meeting this
Requirement
<http://wiki.digitalrepositoryauditandcertification.org/bin/view/Main/Co
mbinedWithNewTemplate?template=viewprint&amp;sortcol=0;table=268;up=0#so
rted_table>  

	Text found in the Evidence section of the current TRAC document
goes here. 

	... 

Discussion
<http://wiki.digitalrepositoryauditandcertification.org/bin/view/Main/Co
mbinedWithNewTemplate?template=viewprint&amp;sortcol=0;table=269;up=0#so
rted_table>  

	Text found in the supporting text section of the current TRAC
document that does not apply to all repositories goes here. 

	
************************************************************************
***********************************

	Is this sufficient for the initial version of the White Book?

	 

	Mark



	>
	 
	Mark Conrad
	Electronic Records Archives (ERA)
	NHER 
	The National Archives and Records Administration
	Building 494 Second Floor
	310 State Route 956
	Rocket Center, WV  26726
	 
	Phone: 304-726-7820
	Fax: 304-726-7815
	Email: mark.conrad at nara.gov 
	ERA Website: http://www.archives.gov/era/>>
D.L.Giaretta at rl.ac.uk 5/19/2008 5:38 AM >>>
	
	I've revised the charter on the WIki to be in line with CCSDS
expectations - in particular specifying a Magenta Book - see
http://wiki.digitalrepositoryauditandcertification.org/bin/view/Main/Rac
Charter
	 
	I've also added the "Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and
Certification of Digital Repositories" which we spoke about in
Washington - based on examination of how other related standards link to
the audit and certification process e.g. ISO 27006.
	.
	I've also taken a snapshot of the Wiki and created a CCSDS White
Book - version 0 - see
http://wiki.digitalrepositoryauditandcertification.org/bin/viewfile/Main
/WebHome?rev=1;filename=MetricsForDigitalRepositoryAuditAndCertification
WBv0.doc
	 
	If these look OK I'll submit to CCSDS tomorrow to complete the
creation of the Working Group. 
	 
	..David

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/moims-rac/attachments/20080519/02337c0a/attachment-0001.htm