<span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial">Hi Dave,</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial">instead of constraining
the CESG/CMC with dependencies, wouldn't be more efficient to wait for
the confirmed publication of NDM/XML 2.0 and then submit the resolution
for the corrigenda? It will be slightly slower, but probably of just 2
weeks.</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial">Please let me know
what you think.</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial">Regards,</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial">__mario</span>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">From:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"Berry,
David S (US 3920)" <david.s.berry@jpl.nasa.gov></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">To:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"Mario.Merri@esa.int"
<Mario.Merri@esa.int></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Cc:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"marc.duhaze@cnes.fr"
<marc.duhaze@cnes.fr>, "moims-nav-exec@mailman.ccsds.org"
<moims-nav-exec@mailman.ccsds.org></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Date:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">03/03/2021
01:59</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Subject:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">Corrigenda
for CDM, RDM, TDM Related to the NDM/XML 2.0</span>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><tt><span style=" font-size:10pt"><br>
Mario:<br>
<br>
As part of the development of the NDM/XML 2.0 project, there are some minor
corrections that affect the CCSDS Conjunction Data Message, Re-Entry Data
Message, and Tracking Data Message. These changes are largely (but not
exclusively) associated with the addition of schemas that are qualified
with respect to a namespace (longstanding request of CCSDS Service Management
WG). They do not affect the technical content of the documents, only aspects
of the XML formatting of the existing technical material.<br>
<br>
I have attached a document that contains the Corrigenda for all 3 documents
(CDM, RDM, TDM). <br>
<br>
It was necessary to wait until the NDM/XML 2.0 was in the hands of the
Secretariat because these Corrigenda cannot precede the publication of
that document. Ideally, the "approval to publish" polls for the
NDM/XML 2.0 and the Corrigenda for the CDM, RDM, and TDM can be incorporated
in the same set of CESG and CMC polls.<br>
<br>
If you could review these Corrigenda and issue a Resolution requesting
the requisite polling, the Navigation WG would greatly appreciate it. Please
advise if there are changes that you suggest.<br>
<br>
Regards, and Thanks!<br>
David<br>
<br>
P.S.: Going forward there will still be some Corrigenda for existing Blue
Books when there is a new edition of the NDM/XML document, but they should
be much more limited in scope and can likely be accommodated by trivial
editorial changes that do not require polling (e.g., version numbers of
schemas) rather than the textual changes required by the NDM/XML 2.0.<br>
<br>
[attachment "cdm-rdm-tdm-corrigenda.docx" deleted by Mario Merri/esoc/ESA]
</span></tt>
<br>
<br><PRE>This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo@esa.int).
</PRE>