<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Hi David,<br>
      <br>
      The "Description and Reference" column has been renamed to "<span>Description</span>"
      in the relevant registries on the beta website.<br>
      <br>
      It will be pushed on the production website in the next
      deployment.<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Best regards,
Julien Bernard
Space Assigned Numbers Authority</pre>
    <p><span></span></p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2019-10-06 23 h 21, 'Berry, David S
      (US 3920)' via Engineering wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:3FC652C0-6914-40D9-B2C6-FD80B4098A68@jpl.nasa.gov">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
        medium)">
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Dear SANA Operator:</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>I am sending this email to start upon
            the clean-up actions requested by Peter Shames. I will break
            this task up into manageable chunks in order to facilitate
            actions for me, actions for you, and Peter's auditing
            function.</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>In this email I will request action
            on item #3b below (highlighted).</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>For the following registries, please
            change the name of the "Description and Reference" column to
            simply "Description". At a later time I will follow up with
            material for the existing "References" column.</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>All registries are members of the
            higher hierarchical level registry
            <a
              href="https://sanaregistry.org/r/navigation_standard_normative_annexes"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://sanaregistry.org/r/navigation_standard_normative_annexes</a>
            . The affected sub-registries are:</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span><a
              href="https://sanaregistry.org/r/orbital_elements"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://sanaregistry.org/r/orbital_elements</a>
          </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span><a
              href="https://sanaregistry.org/r/attitude_and_spacecraft_conventions"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://sanaregistry.org/r/attitude_and_spacecraft_conventions</a>
          </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span><a
              href="https://sanaregistry.org/r/orbital_covariance_matrix_types"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://sanaregistry.org/r/orbital_covariance_matrix_types</a>
          </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span><a
              href="https://sanaregistry.org/r/time_systems"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://sanaregistry.org/r/time_systems</a>
          </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span><a
              href="https://sanaregistry.org/r/celestial_body_reference_frames"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://sanaregistry.org/r/celestial_body_reference_frames</a>
          </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>The other sub-registries either have
            no "Description" column, or are already named simply
            "Description".</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Regards,</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>David</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>From: </span></b><span>"Shames,
              Peter M (US 312B)" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov"><peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov></a><br>
              <b>Date: </b>Thursday, September 12, 2019 at 3:27 PM<br>
              <b>To: </b>"Berry, David S (US 3920)"
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:david.s.berry@jpl.nasa.gov"><david.s.berry@jpl.nasa.gov></a>, "SANA Steering Group
              (SSG)" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ssg@mailman.ccsds.org"><ssg@mailman.ccsds.org></a>, Space Assigned
              Numbers Authority <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:info@sanaregistry.org"><info@sanaregistry.org></a><br>
              <b>Cc: </b><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:thomas.gannett@tgannett.net">"thomas.gannett@tgannett.net"</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:thomas.gannett@tgannett.net"><thomas.gannett@tgannett.net></a>, <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Mario.Merri@esa.int">"Mario.Merri@esa.int"</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Mario.Merri@esa.int"><Mario.Merri@esa.int></a><br>
              <b>Subject: </b>Re: URGENT: The CCSDS Re-Entry Data
              Message Standard</span></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal">Dear David, SANA Steering Group, and SANA
          Operator</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">I have reviewed this set of concerns with
          David Berry and reviewed the status of the several registries
          that are involved in this standard.  I am convinced that the
          Nav WG has done due diligence in creating, vetting, and
          validating these several registries.  I had voiced some
          concerns to David about the way that certain of the registry
          entries are formatted and he has agreed to resolve these in an
          expeditious fashion.  Based on this agreement I have agreed to
          conditionally approve these registries.   I am sending this
          note to affirm that and to ask that the following actions be
          carried out:</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        <ol type="1" start="1">
          <li class="MsoListParagraph">Assign the following registries
            and their contents "Approved" status.  The Nav WG has vetted
            this and I see no reason not to approve them:
            <ol type="a" start="1">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph">Orbit Centers: This WG level
                registry is a candidate registry.</li>
              <li class="MsoListParagraph">Time Systems: This WG level
                registry is a candidate registry.</li>
              <li class="MsoListParagraph">Celestial Body Reference
                Frames: This WG level registry is a candidate registry.</li>
              <li class="MsoListParagraph">Orbit Relative Reference
                Frames: This WG level registry was re-created as a
                candidate registry.</li>
            </ol>
          </li>
          <li class="MsoListParagraph">After this is done the related
            document, the Re-Entry Data Message (RDM) Draft CCSDS
            Standard, can proceed through the approval for publication
            process.</li>
          <li class="MsoListParagraph">David has agreed to do the
            following clean-up actions on these registries, to be
            carried out as quickly as possible, but not prior to
            starting the approval process:
            <ol type="a" start="1">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph">Fix the reference fields in
                all of these registries, where appropriate, by moving
                text from the "Description and Reference" field to the
                "Reference Field"</li>
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"><span>Change the name of the
                  "Description and Reference" column to just
                  "Description"</span></li>
              <li class="MsoListParagraph">Adopt the existing
                Organization Role
                <span>"Flight Dynamics Data Providers", OID =
                  1.3.112.4.5.1.4.3</span> , for the Nav organizations
                that provide this RDM service (and document it)</li>
              <li class="MsoListParagraph">Work with at least the
                members of the Nav WG to get their agencies who do
                provide these kinds of data to identify as service
                providers</li>
            </ol>
          </li>
        </ol>
        <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">If anyone has issues with this please let
          me know ASAP.  Otherwise please move ahead with all due speed
          to get these registries sorted out so that this doc may get
          into the Approve for Publication queue.</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">Thanks, Peter</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>From:
              </span></b><span>David Berry
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:david.s.berry@jpl.nasa.gov"><david.s.berry@jpl.nasa.gov></a><br>
              <b>Date: </b>Saturday, August 31, 2019 at 9:16 AM<br>
              <b>To: </b>Space Assigned Numbers Authority
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:info@sanaregistry.org"><info@sanaregistry.org></a><br>
              <b>Cc: </b>Tom Gannett
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:thomas.gannett@tgannett.net"><thomas.gannett@tgannett.net></a>, Mario Merri
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Mario.Merri@esa.int"><Mario.Merri@esa.int></a>, Peter Shames
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov"><peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov></a><br>
              <b>Subject: </b>URGENT: The CCSDS Re-Entry Data Message
              Standard</span></p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">Dear SANA:</p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">Yesterday 30-Aug-2019 I received a call
            from Tom Gannett, CCSDS Lead Editor, regarding the Re-Entry
            Data Message Draft CCSDS Standard (hereafter, "RDM"). The
            RDM is at the point of being submitted to the CESG and CMC
            for the polls required for approval to publish, however, Tom
            pointed out an issue that I need to address. Specifically,
            he stated that he could not prepare the required RDM polls
            of CESG and CMC at this time.
          </p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">The RDM requires that the values for
            several keywords be drawn from SANA registries, as follows:</p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">1. Organizations registry: This
            enterprise level registry is an approved registry; no action
            is necessary.</p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">2. Conjunction Data Message CATALOG_NAME
            registry: This Working Group (WG) level registry is an
            approved registry; no action is necessary.</p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">3. Orbit Centers: This WG level registry
            is a candidate registry.</p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">4. Time Systems: This WG level registry
            is a candidate registry.</p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">5. Celestial Body Reference Frames: This
            WG level registry is a candidate registry.</p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">6. Orbit Relative Reference Frames: This
            WG level registry was created in the SANA "beta", but has
            since been overlaid. The material necessary to create the
            registry has been provided to
            <a href="mailto:info@sanaregistry.org"
              moz-do-not-send="true">info@sanaregistry.org</a>.</p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">To date I have assumed that once a Blue
            Book is approved by the CESG and CMC that any relevant
            candidate registries would be promoted to "Approved', but
            according to Tom these polls cannot proceed without the
            various registries being approved. The relevant SANA-related
            Yellow Books (313.0-Y-2, 313.1-Y-1, 313.2-Y-1) do not
            mention CESG/CMC polling in any significant fashion, but
            there is a statement in 313.0-Y-2, section 3.10, that "The
            SANA operator shall publish the approved registry prior to
            the final publication of the document that creates it."
            Given that my prior assumption has apparently been in error,
            it appears that the RDM cannot be approved for publication
            without the registries #3, #4, #5, #6 listed above being
            "approved".</p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">Accordingly, I would like to request that
            the registries listed as #3, #4, #5 above be "approved" as
            soon as possible, and that the registry listed as #6 above
            be created as soon as possible for review by the Navigation
            Working Group and then approved as soon as possible.
            According to my understanding, this will then allow Tom
            Gannett to create the requisite CESG and CMC "approval to
            publish" polls. Our WG has been hoping for publication of
            the RDM prior to the Fall 2019 CCSDS Meetings, and I believe
            this may still be possible, though the timing will likely be
            tight. The WG will certainly do everything in its power to
            respond immediately to any information or actions required
            by the SANA Operator in furtherance of this request
            (reference 313.2-Y-1 section 2.3(i)).</p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">Best Regards, and Thank You so much for
            the excellent SANA support to date,</p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">David Berry</p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">Chair, CCSDS Navigation Working Group</p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">
</pre>
  </body>
</html>