<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>As we discussed today, I’m resending out the “deployment options” figure that we settled on last October. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Chart 1 is the main chart for this discussion. The left-hand option is the “baseline option”. Steve, if you don’t try to cover multiple options in your component diagram, I would say the “baseline option” is the one you cover. And then perhaps text in the white book (ADD) can mention other options. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>However, I will say that I think a reader would benefit from seeing where the communications layer separates the client from the archive systems. Not seeing that communications layer will (I think) particularly confuse novice readers that are trying to focus on which side (client or archive) they’re on and what they need to implement. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>David, do you plan to use this in the green book? I don’t remember if there’s a discussion of deployment options. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Chart 2 discusses what we plan to develop, but I’m not sure it’s accurate for our latest discussions. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#002060'> -=- Mike<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#002060'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Mike Kearney</span><span style='color:#002060'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#002060'>Huntsville, Alabama, USA <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b>From:</b> kearneysolutions@gmail.com <kearneysolutions@gmail.com> <br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, October 26, 2021 10:59 AM<br><b>To:</b> 'MOIMS-Data Archive Interoperability' <moims-dai@mailman.ccsds.org><br><b>Subject:</b> Updated charts from today's DAI telecon<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>After today’s telecon, I updated the charts to delete all the deployment options that we rejected, leaving only the ones that were agreed to. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Actually, there are a few of the “native” configurations that we didn’t quite discuss much (they were on chart 7 of the prior presentation) but based on our discussion of allowing implementations that don’t expose interfaces 1 or 3, I believe these fit what we agreed to. Corrections or comments are welcome on that. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Added one chart with text for the main points that we discussed, as well. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#002060'> -=- Mike<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#002060'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal>Mike Kearney<span style='color:#002060'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#002060'>Huntsville, Alabama, USA <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>