<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space
{mso-style-name:gmail-m_1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Hi,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Responses interspersed below.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Peace and joy,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>-JOhn<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b>From:</b> MOIMS-DAI <moims-dai-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Mark Conrad<br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, April 4, 2019 11:43 AM<br><b>To:</b> MOIMS-Data Archive Interoperability <moims-dai@mailman.ccsds.org><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Moims-dai] FW: CDO text<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>John,<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Please see my comments interspersed in your text.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><br clear=all><o:p></o:p></p><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Mark Conrad<br>NARA Information Services<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>Systems Engineering Division (IT)<br>The National Archives and Records Administration<br>Erma Ora Byrd Conference and Learning Center<br>Building 494, Room 225<br>610 State Route 956<br>Rocket Center, WV 26726<br><br>Phone: 304-726-7820<br>Fax: 304-726-7802<br>Email: <a href="mailto:mark.conrad@nara.gov" target="_blank">mark.conrad@nara.gov</a> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 3:34 AM <<a href="mailto:garrett@his.com">garrett@his.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Hi,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>I favor dropping that sentence.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>One of my objections is that it is that I would prefer that we would define things by their information model not by how the particular object is used.<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></blockquote><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>- This would defeat the entire purpose of this document from an archival perspective. A few of the key sentences expressing the intent of the authors - going back to the first version of the OAIS - are: "For example, archival science focuses on preservation of the ‘record’. This term is not used in the OAIS Reference Model, but one mapping might approximately equate it with ‘Content Information<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>within an Archival Information Package’ (see definitions below, as well as 2.2 and 4.2 for context)." The current proposed revision of OAIS changes Content Information to Content Data Object, but as I noted previously no archives I have personal experience with would consider a Content Data Object without Representation Information a record.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:.5in'><span style='color:#00B0F0'>JGG: I don’t understand why the change of PDI terms applying only to CDO rather than CI would nullify the whole OAIS document. One main objection I keep hearing is that the change implies that an Archive can no longer preserve RepInfo. The change is just that the target of the PDI term was proposed to be updated to be the CDO instead of Content Information. Defining PDI as applying to Content Information did not mean that Fixity Information or Provenance Information did not need to be preserved as a normal course of action. Defining PDI as applying to CDO does NOT mean that RepInfo does not need to be preserved.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:.5in'><span style='color:#00B0F0'>I believe the intent of the original authors was to create a standard that would allow a number of different communities (Archivves, Libraries, science information centers, company repositories, military, etc.) to communicate about digital preservation so they could all learn best practices from the others. Those communities sometimes used the different terms for the same things or used the same terms differently. In such cases, the authors tried to pick terms that did not have as many preconceived ideas associated with them and tried to come to consensus on what they meant. The authors tried to find <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:.5in'><span style='color:#00B0F0'>If you objection is primarily to the change in the one sentence giving examples of how the record equates to Content Data Object, I am fine with changing CDO back to Content Information in that instance. When I proposed that change as one of many updates that we agreed to last year that was one that I wasn’t sure of and I thought we specifically discussed it. I certainly am OK with deferring to your judgement as to how the formal Archives community views that term. But certainly there are differences in the definition of “record” which is why that term is not used in OAIS. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:.5in'><span style='color:#00B0F0'>I think there are many “archives” (but probably not National Archives) where every RepInfo object has full PDI for it. I think the DC for many scientific “archives” are quite happy to just have RepInfo describing the CDO without necessarily caring if that RepInfo had PDI information for it.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:.5in'><span style='color:#00B0F0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:.5in'><span style='color:#00B0F0'>I assume meant the current proposed revision of OAIS changes THE APPLICATION OF THE PDI TERMS FROM Content Information to CDO.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:.5in'><span style='color:#00B0F0'>We certainly aren’t trying to equate a CDO with Content Information. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:.5in'><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>It also directly contradicts Section 4.2.1.4 Taxonomy of Information Object Classes Used by OAIS and its sub-sections. "This subsection builds on the discussions in 2.2 about the types of supporting information needed to enable Long Term Preservation and the discussion in the previous subsection on the role of Representation Information. The information modeling in this subsection discusses several types of Information Objects that are used in the OAIS. The objects are categorized <b><i>by their content and function in the operation of an OAIS</i></b> including Content Information objects, Preservation Description Information objects, Packaging Information objects, and Descriptive Information objects." Content Information has different <b><i>content and function</i></b> in an OAIS than PDI, Packaging Information, Descriptive Information, etc.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <span style='color:#00B0F0'>JGG: I agree. I wasn’t trying to say that there are not different types of Information Objects.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#00B0F0'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#00B0F0'> I believe the difference in content and function have meaning primarily within a single AIP. Surely identical (or substantially identical) Information Objects COULD be a Content Information in one AIP and RepInfo in another AIP.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#00B0F0'> All the listed types of Information Objects are defined by how they are used within an AIP. Does that mean that they should not be referred to outside an AIP. Perhaps that would help clear up some understandings. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> I would prefer to be able to call every combination of a Content Data Object and Representation Information Content Information (even if that object wasn’t a target of preservation).<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></blockquote><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>I assume you mean every combination of a Data Object and Representation Information. Every <b><i>Content</i></b> Data Object and its Representation Information is Content Information. While you might prefer to treat all combinations of a Data Object and its Representation Information as Content Information, to do so contradicts many sections of the OAIS.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:.5in'><span style='color:#00B0F0'>JGG: I think you are right that every combination of a Data Object and RepInfo is not Content Information.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:.5in'><span style='color:#00B0F0'>Any Data Object with its RepInfo is an Information Object.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:.5in'><span style='color:#00B0F0'>One type of Information Object is Content Information, which includes a Data Object, which also happens to be a Content Data Object.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;margin-left:11.55pt'> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div></blockquote><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Additionally to address the other issue from the last telecon, we should probably address the new wording for the Producer definition.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>“<b>Producer</b>: The role played by those persons or client systems that provide the information to be preserved. This can include internal or external OAIS persons or systems.” <o:p></o:p></p></div></div></blockquote><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>If people are now understanding that this indicates that the Producer can be inside an OAIS, then that contradicts all the diagrams we have that show the Producer as external to the OAIS.<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></blockquote><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>I don't know who has this understanding. The proposed definition says, "The role played by those persons or client systems that provide the information to be preserved. This can include internal or external OAIS persons or systems." The 2002 definition was, "The role played by those persons, or client systems, who provide the information<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>to be preserved. This can include other OAISs or internal OAIS persons or systems." The 2012 definition is the same as the 2002 definition. Both these definitions say basically the same thing - an OAIS person or system can take on the <b><i>role</i></b> of Producer. It <b><i>does not say</i></b> that because an OAIS person or system takes on the role of Producer that the Producer is then internal to the OAIS.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>To start with see Section 2.1 which starts with our simplest environment diagram and that includes the text,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>“Outside the OAIS are Producers, Consumers, and Management.”<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>We have consistently said that anytime anything internal to an OAIS that takes on the role of Producer, then while it is executing that role, it is considered external to the OAIS. That means it has to have Submissions Agreements, etc. and the data that it submits has to undergo checks.<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></blockquote><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>I agree. I didn't hear anyone contradict these points.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#00B0F0'>JGG: I think we agree.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Peace and joy,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>-JOhn<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><b>From:</b> MOIMS-DAI <<a href="mailto:moims-dai-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org" target="_blank">moims-dai-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org</a>> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Robert Downs<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, April 2, 2019 4:19 PM<br><b>To:</b> MOIMS-Data Archive Interoperability <<a href="mailto:moims-dai@mailman.ccsds.org" target="_blank">moims-dai@mailman.ccsds.org</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Moims-dai] FW: CDO text<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Please let me add my voice of agreement to Don's point and Mark's agreement that Content Information should be defined as "the original target of preservation".<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Thanks,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Bob<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Robert R. Downs, PhD<br>Senior Digital Archivist and Senior Staff Associate Officer of Research<br>Acting Head of Cyberinfrastructure and Informatics Research and Development<br>Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN),<br>The Earth Institute, Columbia University<br>P.O. Box 1000, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964 USA<br>Voice: 845-365-8985; fax: 845-365-8922<br>E-mail: <a href="mailto:rdowns@ciesin.columbia.edu" target="_blank">rdowns@ciesin.columbia.edu</a><br>Columbia University CIESIN Web site: <a href="http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu" target="_blank">http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu</a><br>ORCID: 0000-0002-8595-5134<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:30 PM Mark Conrad <<a href="mailto:mark.conrad@nara.gov" target="_blank">mark.conrad@nara.gov</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Well said, Don. I have become the lone voice at our weekly meetings defending Content Information as the information originally provided by the Producer. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><br clear=all><o:p></o:p></p><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Mark Conrad<br>NARA Information Services<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:12.0pt'>Systems Engineering Division (IT)<br>The National Archives and Records Administration<br>Erma Ora Byrd Conference and Learning Center<br>Building 494, Room 225<br>610 State Route 956<br>Rocket Center, WV 26726<br><br>Phone: 304-726-7820<br>Fax: 304-726-7802<br>Email: <a href="mailto:mark.conrad@nara.gov" target="_blank">mark.conrad@nara.gov</a> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:47 PM D or C Sawyer <<a href="mailto:Sawyer@acm.org" target="_blank">Sawyer@acm.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Hi David,<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>There is no valid reason to change the Content Information definition from ‘<span style='color:#FF2600'>the original target of preservation’</span> to ‘<span style='color:#FF2600'>a target of preservation</span>’. This has been there from the beginning to make clear it is referring to the original information provided by the Producer and not just any information within the Archive. This is important to ensure that when people are discussing preservation within an OAIS context, everyone understands this is the information originally provided by the Producer. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Of course we understand why you want to make this change because you still want to move Content Information to being ANY information in the Archive so you can claim the whole process is recursive by definition ‘and been there from the beginning'. This would be a radical, ambiguity enhancing, change to the long standing common understanding of the OAIS information and functional modeling. For these reasons this proposed change should be thoroughly rejected by the group.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Cheers-<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Don<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;margin-bottom:12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></p><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>On Apr 2, 2019, at 10:06 AM, David Giaretta <<a href="mailto:david@giaretta.org" target="_blank">david@giaretta.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><b>From:</b><span class=gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space> </span>David Giaretta <<a href="mailto:david@giaretta.org" target="_blank"><span style='color:#954F72'>david@giaretta.org</span></a>><span class=gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space> </span><br><b>Sent:</b><span class=gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space> </span>02 April 2019 13:12<br><b>To:</b><span class=gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space> </span>'Mark Conrad' <<a href="mailto:mark.conrad@nara.gov" target="_blank"><span style='color:#954F72'>mark.conrad@nara.gov</span></a>>; 'John Garrett' <<a href="mailto:garrett@his.com" target="_blank"><span style='color:#954F72'>garrett@his.com</span></a>><br><b>Subject:</b><span class=gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space> </span>CDO text<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>My suggestions for the additional text:<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Change in current draft from:<o:p></o:p></p></div><div style='margin-left:.25in'><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><b>Preservation Description Information (PDI</b>): The<span class=gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space><b> </b></span>information, which along with Representation Information, is necessary for adequate preservation of the Content Data Object and which can be categorized as Provenance Information, Context Information, Reference Information, Fixity Information, and Access Rights Information.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div style='margin-left:.5in'><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Note: Defining PDI (as well as its components - Provenance Information, Context Information, Reference Information, Fixity Information, and Access Rights Information) as relevant to the Content Data Object does not mean that those concerns are any less important for other data objects or at other levels, for example, it is important to apply reference, fixity, provenance, context and access rights to Representation Information, or to any other information the Archive is preserving. Definition of these terms as relevant to the Content Data Object is simply to ease discussion of these concepts at the Content Data Object level.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>To:<o:p></o:p></p></div><div style='margin-left:.25in'><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><b>Preservation Description Information (PDI</b>): The<span class=gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space><b> </b></span>information, which along with Representation Information, is necessary for adequate preservation of the Content Data Object and which can be categorized as Provenance Information, Context Information, Reference Information, Fixity Information, and Access Rights Information.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div style='margin-left:.5in'><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Note: Defining PDI (as well as its components - Provenance Information, Context Information, Reference Information, Fixity Information, and Access Rights Information) as relevant to the Content Data Object does not mean that those concerns are any less important for other data objects or at other levels, for example, it is important to apply reference, fixity, provenance, context and access rights to Representation Information, or to any other information the Archive is preserving.<span class=gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space> </span><s><span style='color:red'>Definition of these terms as relevant to the Content Data Object is simply to ease discussion of these concepts at the Content Data Object level.</span></s><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>I suggest deleting the last sentence because it does not make sense to me.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Change<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div style='margin-left:.5in'><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><b>Content Information</b>:<span class=gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space><b> </b></span><span style='letter-spacing:-.2pt'>A set of information that is the original target of preservation. It is an Information Object composed of its Content Data Object and its Representation Information.</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>To<o:p></o:p></p></div><div style='margin-left:.5in'><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><b>Content Information</b>:<span class=gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space><b> </b></span><span style='letter-spacing:-.2pt'>A set of information that is<span class=gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space> </span><span style='color:red'>a</span><span class=gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space> </span><s><span style='color:red'>the original</span></s><span class=gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space><span style='color:red'> </span></span>target of preservation. It is an Information Object composed of its Content Data Object and its Representation Information.</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>There are a few other places the change “the original” to “a” would also be needed.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Add to the end of section 4.2.1.4 Taxonomy of Information Object Classes Used by OAIS<o:p></o:p></p></div><div style='margin-left:.5in'><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='color:red'>Content Information is any Information Object which is being preserved by the Archive.<span class=gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space> </span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div style='margin-left:.5in'><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='color:red'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>I don’t know an easy way to put this into the UML diagram.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>Also add the end of section 4.2.1.4.1 Content Information:<span class=gmail-m1976168590570609049gmail-m2055665613139594563gmail-m-8345066357735914394apple-converted-space> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div style='margin-left:.5in'><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='color:red'>Any Information Object being preserved by the Archive, such as Representation Information, PDI etc., may also be considered to be Content Information.</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>..David<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'>_______________________________________________<br>MOIMS-DAI mailing list<br></span><a href="mailto:MOIMS-DAI@mailman.ccsds.org" target="_blank"><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:#954F72'>MOIMS-DAI@mailman.ccsds.org</span></a><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif'><br></span><a href="https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai" target="_blank"><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica",sans-serif;color:#954F72'>https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai</span></a><o:p></o:p></p></div></blockquote></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>_______________________________________________<br>MOIMS-DAI mailing list<br><a href="mailto:MOIMS-DAI@mailman.ccsds.org" target="_blank">MOIMS-DAI@mailman.ccsds.org</a><br><a href="https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai" target="_blank">https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div><p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'>_______________________________________________<br>MOIMS-DAI mailing list<br><a href="mailto:MOIMS-DAI@mailman.ccsds.org" target="_blank">MOIMS-DAI@mailman.ccsds.org</a><br><a href="https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai" target="_blank">https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal>_______________________________________________<br>MOIMS-DAI mailing list<br><a href="mailto:MOIMS-DAI@mailman.ccsds.org" target="_blank">MOIMS-DAI@mailman.ccsds.org</a><br><a href="https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai" target="_blank">https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></body></html>