<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-GB link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Hi John<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Some comments which I will also put on the review site.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>The second and third paragraph of section 6.1 should be a separate subsection since it covers aspects which are applicable to all the rest of the section. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><i>Distributed <span style='text-decoration:none !msorm'><s><span style='text-decoration:none !msorm'>D<span style='text-decoration:none !msorm'><span style='text-decoration:none !msorm'>igital Preservation</span></span></span></s></span>: </i>Archives that have distributed the OAIS functionality either geographically or organizationally. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>The “either geographically or organizationally” seems inconsistent in that we say elsewhere that an independent archive may be geographically distributed. On the other hand you say that the classifications are “somewhat orthogonal” so maybe there is no problem but it should be clarified.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>An independent Archive is assumed to serve only a single Designated Community. (Note however that each AIP in the Archive may have its own single Designated Community.) <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>These tewo sentences are inconsistent. I think that “</span><span style='color:black'>serve only a single Designated Community” should be “serve only a single set of Designated Communities”<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:36.0pt'><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>6.1.4 All in-house archives says “using their own equipment and primarily at a single location” – does that really mean within a single organisation?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>6.1.6 Archives with distributed functionality starts “</span>Archives that have distributed the OAIS functionality either geographically or organizationally. “ This is missing some words. It would be simpler to say “Archives that have distributed the OAIS functionality organizationally may be referred to as having “organisationally distributed functionality”. Maybe the title should also be “<span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Archives with organisationally distributed functionality”<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>..David<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US> MOIMS-DAI <moims-dai-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org> <b>On Behalf Of </b>John Garrett<br><b>Sent:</b> 05 October 2018 20:13<br><b>To:</b> 'MOIMS-Data Archive Interoperability' <moims-dai@mailman.ccsds.org><br><b>Subject:</b> [Moims-dai] My latest attempt at OAIS Section 6 (SC#135)<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Hi,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>I’ve attached my latest attempt for obtaining consensus for Section 6.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>We will discuss this at the next MOIMS-DAI telecon on Tuesday. If you are interested in this topic and if possible, please plan to join us that day. Also if possible you can send comments and suggested updates before the telecon.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>This is the last outstanding Suggested Change for this round of OAIS update. Once completed, we will generate a complete new draft to send around for Working Group review and comment and then submit for balloting by CCSDS and ISO. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>The face-to-face meeting for our Working Group at the CCSDS technical meeting is just over a week away and we would like to discuss the final draft during that meeting.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>In this version of Section 6, I’ve added back another of the Outer OAIS – Inner OAIS examples. The examples appear as an example of the general Distributed Archive style discussed in Section 6.1.6. I also removed some of the discussion of Inner OAIS only need to worry about bit preservation. Overall encouraging the idea that any OAIS only needs to worry about bit preservation is contrary to what we are trying to do with the OAIS standard. Too many “archives” already take that view. Also, I’ve moved OAIS Section 6.2 Management issues for Federated Archives to the end of Section 6.1.3 Federated Archives<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Peace and joy,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>-JOhn<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></body></html>