<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>You may recall that we had discussions about mapping data preservation functions to project phases. I did one version of a mapping chart which we didn’t use. Since then the phase descriptions in the document have changed considerably. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Last week I was working on material for a class I was going to teach next week (it’s been postponed), and I came up with Chart 1 in the attached document. It has been evolving for awhile. Today I added mapping to PMBOK and PMI phases. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>So then, I thought I would add a mapping to the phases currently in our IPELTU document. (“I pelt you?”) The result is chart 2 in the attached. It’s not finished. If this is useful, those blue categories on the left-hand side should be updated. Perhaps showing OAIS under or in place of “Technical References”, and PAIS under or in place of “Technical Implementations.” But before I put any further effort into this, I wanted the discussion in DAI about whether it’s useful or not. Or you guys can freely modify and add your own spin. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Notice the ©SIF on the first chart, because it came from our class material. With the revisions on Chart 2, there’s no problem with us using it. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The third chart is just some notes about various schemes of project phases. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>So… is this Chart 2 useful in IPELTU, or not? <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> -=- Mike<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Mike Kearney<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Huntsville, Alabama, USA<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>