<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Hi all,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">I agree with the sentiments below. Rosenthal doesn’t seem to understand the purpose of a reference model or the metrics. He is arguing from implementation. For
example, the PDS is a distributed system and we had no problem applying OAIS RM principles. A tough response is appropriate. Sorry this is so late.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Steve<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></a></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> moims-dai-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org [mailto:moims-dai-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>D or C Sawyer<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, February 17, 2016 4:46 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> David Giaretta <david@GIARETTA.ORG><br>
<b>Cc:</b> ISO-PTAB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK; MOIMS DAI List <moims-dai@mailman.ccsds.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Moims-dai] Re: Comments of Rosenthal's "Case for a revision of OAIS"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">Hi David,<br>
<br>
I agree with your comments (but see my text) and Mark’s comments. I’ve added a few of my own. Perhaps my most important one is the first about how to judge the effectiveness of OAIS. Any revisions to OAIS, as happened with the one revision to date, needs
to keep in mind the main purpose of the model which is to promote effective communication. This require widespread adoption. The model can not be too huge and complex, or it will become useless and fall out of usage. Certainly it can evolve, but I believe
this should be limited to improving clarity, correcting errors, and only adding new concepts that seem really significant. I agree with Mark that such a case has not been made by the author. It would be more productive if the author would generate a mapping
of how they related their CLOCKSS to OAIS terms and concepts, and put that out for discussion. A really informative discussion could result. Presumably some of that mapping is contained in some of the links, but I’m not going to dig thru to find it. Perhaps
you would suggest this to Rosenthal.<br>
<br>
Cheers-<br>
Don<br>
<br>
(PS I don’t know if I’m reaching people on ISO-PTAB. John has updated me on MOIMS-DAI by including my other address, and that is working)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Feb 17, 2016, at 3:41 PM, David Giaretta <<a href="mailto:david@GIARETTA.ORG">david@GIARETTA.ORG</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Thanks Mark<br>
> <br>
> I’ll add some of your extra points. With your support I’ll harden the tone. Will also change or remove the last para as you suggest.<br>
> <br>
> ..David<br>
> <br>
> From: ISO Primary TDR Accreditation Board [<a href="mailto:ISO-PTAB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK">mailto:ISO-PTAB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK</a>] On Behalf Of Mark Conrad<br>
> Sent: 17 February 2016 17:50<br>
> To: <a href="mailto:ISO-PTAB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK">ISO-PTAB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK</a><br>
> Subject: Re: Comments of Rosenthal's "Case for a revision of OAIS"<br>
> <br>
> David,<br>
> <br>
> If anything I believe you are too kind in your comments. I have put in comments throughout his text. I am not nearly as diplomatic as you are, so I offer them as possible additional fodder for your comments back to Rosenthal. I do think we need to push back
hard. This guy wants to make a name for himself and he would not hesitate to trash perfectly good work that he does not appear to understand to do so.<br>
> <br>
> My two cents.<br>
> <br>
> Mark<br>
> <br>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:09 AM, David Giaretta <<a href="mailto:david@giaretta.org">david@giaretta.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> I prepared the attached document. Before lighting a firestorm I’d appreciate your comments.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> ..David<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">_______________________________________________<br>
Moims-dai mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Moims-dai@mailman.ccsds.org">Moims-dai@mailman.ccsds.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai">http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/moims-dai</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>