<font size=2 face="sans-serif">Dear all,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Please find below the notes of the CESG
webex held on 21st March 2017</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">nestor</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">===============================</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b><u>AGENDA</u></b></font>
<ol>
<li value=1><font size=2 face="sans-serif">CESG Actions still open </font>
<li value=2><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Document Status Queue</font>
<li value=3><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Polls with conditions not yet
resolved</font>
<li value=4><font size=2 face="sans-serif">ESA request to CMC to keep Telerobotics
WG in dormant status</font>
<li value=5><font size=2 face="sans-serif">New proposed DAI WG project
including parallel ISO reviews: Is this a pro or a con ?</font>
<li value=6><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Approval of recommended text
(see below) to amend the Procedures Yellow Book - to provide criteria for
joining the working group mailing lists. (regarding external requests for
individuals with no sponsoring agency.) </font>
<li value=7><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Web info on recently completed
reviews (including the issue of what will be stored and sent to the WG
and who can get access to these inputs and when</font>
<li value=8><font size=2 face="sans-serif">OMG Liaison: RFI on Vocabularies,
Glossaries, Ontologies ?</font>
<li value=9><font size=2 face="sans-serif">AOB</font></ol>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b><u>CESG Actions still open</u></b>
</font>
<ul>
<li><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Action CMC-A-2014-11-01 Peter Shames
was requested to draft a formal memorandum from CCSDS to ISO/TC 20/SC14
(Space Systems and Operations) to describe the coordination needed on RASDS.
Ensure that SC13 is referenced in the draft memorandum. Revised due date
to Spring 2017. </font>
<li><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Action CMC-A-2016-10-12 The CMC asks
the CESG Chair, Nestor Peccia, to find ways within the CESG to improve
the technical quality of documents. </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Due Date - Spring 2017 Technical Meetings</font>
<li><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Action on ADs to update the Area on-line
strategic Plan</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Due Date: Dec 2016</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">SLS, CSS, SIS have updated their plans.
MOIMS, SOIS and SEA have still to update their plans.</font></ul><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b><u>Document
Status Queue</u></b></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">CCSDS 732.1-R-2, Unified Space Link
Protocol (</font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif"><b>Red Book 2</b></font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">)</font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif"><b>
</b></font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">It is under Agency Review</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">CCSDS 522.2-R-0, Mission Operations—Mission
Data Product Distribution Services (</font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif"><b>Proposed
Red Book</b></font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">)</font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif"><b>
11/15/2016 </b></font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><u>Tom to clarify</u></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">CCSDS 524.2-B-0, Mission Operations—Message
Abstraction Layer Binding to TCP/IP Transport and Split Binary Encoding
(</font><font size=2 color=blue face="sans-serif"><b>Draft Blue Book</b></font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">)
1/25/2017 </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">CCSDS 902.1-B-0, Cross Support Service
Management—Simple Schedule Format Specification (</font><font size=2 color=blue face="sans-serif"><b>Draft
Blue Book</b></font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">)</font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif"><b>
7/30/2015</b></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">CCSDS 880.0-G-2.1, Wireless Network
Communications Overview for Space Mission Operations (</font><font size=2 color=#3f621f face="sans-serif"><b>Draft
Green Book</b></font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">) </font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif"><b>3/29/2016
</b></font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">After 1 year it shall get highest
priority. <u>Tom to clarify</u></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">CCSDS 140.1-G-0, Real-Time Weather and
Atmospheric Characterization Data (</font><font size=2 color=#3c613e face="sans-serif"><b>Draft
Green Book</b></font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">)</font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif"><b>
4/7/2016</b></font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> After ca. 1 year it
shall get highest priority. <u>Tom to clarify</u></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">CCSDS 413.1-G-0, Simultaneous Transmission
of GMSK Telemetry and PN Ranging (</font><font size=2 color=#3c613e face="sans-serif"><b>Draft
Green Book</b></font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">) 6/27/2016 After ca.
1 year it shall get highest priority. <u>Tom to clarify</u></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b><u>Polls with conditions not yet
resolved</u></b></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">CCSDS 522.1-B-0, Mission Operations
Monitor & Control Services (Draft Blue Book) <b>New
expedite Agency Review to be initiated</b></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">CCSDS 524.3-R-0, Mission Operations—Message
Abstraction Layer Binding to HTTP Transport and XML Encoding (</font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">Proposed
Red Book</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">) 1/25/2017 Conditions
being resolved</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b><u>ESA requested to CMC to keep Telerobotics
WG in dormant status</u></b></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">CESG agrees to keep the Telerobotics
WG in dormant mode.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b><u>New proposed DAI WG project including
parallel ISO reviews: Is this a pro or a con ?</u></b></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">DAI WG has proposed 2 CMC resolutions,
but the CESG Chair out them on hold because considers that they deserve
a discussion at CESG level</font>
<ol>
<li value=1><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The CMC recognizes the notional
architecture as proposed by the DAI WG as a good basis for planning their
future work in the digital archive arena </font>
<ul>
<li><font size=2 face="sans-serif">ADs to analize the architecture and
give feedback during the next CESG meeting.</font></ul>
<li value=2><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The CMC recognizes that for
the work of the Digital Archive Ingest Working Group, it is important for
the ISO participation to be encouraged during the CCSDS Agency Review phase,
in order to avoid extensive delays and rework in later ISO review phases.
The CMC also recognizes that it is critically important to support this
work for the Digital Preservation community much broader than the nominal
participation of the CCSDS space agencies. The CMC therefore resolves to
express support for the inclusion of the ISO community, and resolves to
commit to an inclusive and transparent review process for the future DAI
WG projects in standards for Digital Preservation.</font>
<ul>
<li><font size=2 face="sans-serif">CESG to discuss this item in the next
CESG meeting</font></ul></ol><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b><u>Approval
of recommended text (see below) to amend the Procedures Yellow Book - to
provide criteria for joining the working group mailing lists. (regarding
external requests for individuals with no sponsoring agency.) </u></b></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Pg 5-2, Sec 5.1.5.4 <br>
From: <br>
5.1.5.4 Official CCSDS E-mail Lists <br>
</font><font size=2 color=blue face="sans-serif">The Secretariat shall
maintain an e-mail list server and provide moderated announcement and discussion
e-mail lists for all CCSDS organizational units, including WGs and BOFs.
A Web interface shall be provided for access to list archives. <br>
The e-mail lists maintained by the Secretariat shall be the official CCSDS
e-mail lists and shall be used for all official CCSDS correspondence distributed
via e-mail to CCSDS organizational units. The Secretariat monitors,
filters, and virus-scans all e-mail sent to CCSDS e-mail lists to remove
SPAM and messages that contain viruses. </font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
To: <br>
5.1.5.4 Official CCSDS E-mail Lists <br>
</font><font size=2 color=blue face="sans-serif">The Secretariat shall
maintain an e-mail list server and provide moderated announcement and discussion
e-mail lists for all CCSDS organizational units, including WGs and BOFs.
A Web interface shall be provided for access to list archives. <br>
The e-mail lists maintained by the Secretariat shall be the official CCSDS
e-mail lists and shall be used for all official CCSDS correspondence distributed
via e-mail to CCSDS organizational units. The Secretariat monitors,
filters, and virus-scans all e-mail sent to CCSDS e-mail lists to remove
SPAM and messages that contain viruses. </font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
</font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">Access to the working email
lists shall be limited to individuals who are members of the CCSDS Working
Groups or CCSDS leadership and who are approved participants in a Working
Group (see 5.2.6.4 Participation). Working Groups may, at their discretion,
request creation of "WG-info" mailing lists for outreach that
is broadly open to the public, but these shall not be used for normal Working
Group operation. </font><font size=2 color=#4f4f4f face="Segoe UI"><br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">And on pg 5-9, sec 5.2.6.4 <br>
From: <br>
5.2.6.4 Participation <br>
</font><font size=2 color=blue face="sans-serif">Working Group participation
is generally limited to WG members; however, occasional participation by
ad-hoc technical experts may take place. Working group members must be
affiliated with member or observer agencies, or liaison or associate organizations.
Any WG participant who does not meet these criteria must be endorsed by
an authorized representative from a member or observer agency.</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> <br>
To: <br>
5.2.6.4 Participation <br>
</font><font size=2 color=blue face="sans-serif">Working Group participation
is generally limited to WG members; however, occasional participation by
ad-hoc technical experts may take place. Working group members must be
affiliated with member or observer agencies, or liaison or associate organizations.
Any WG participant who does not meet these criteria must be endorsed by
an authorized representative from a member or observer agency. </font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
</font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">Working Group participants
should register with the CCSDS online Collaborative Work Environment (CWE)
via the "Request Login" link (</font><a href=http://cwe.ccsds.org/ReqLogin.aspx><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">http://cwe.ccsds.org/ReqLogin.aspx</font></a><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">).
Approved registration enables access to CWE private working group areas
and is required for working group meeting attendance. CWE registrants
must be approved by a sponsoring agency or the Secretariat.” </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">CESG concludes that </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">NP to check with the Secretariat the
way to improve the request for membership and CWE account and the associated
sponsorship. First step is to become a member and the second one is to
get a CWE account.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">NP to inform the WG Chairs that they
need to check their WG membership classifying them for the WG or WG-info
lists</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">NP to ask the Secretariat for the mailing
list of all WGs</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">YB shall specify the approving authority
at Agency level (CMC ? ). This has to be discussed with the CMC</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b><u>Web info on recently completed
reviews (including the issue of what will be stored and sent to the WG
and who can get access to these inputs and when</u></b></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Gippo has prepared a presentation addressing
the issue.(see attachment)</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Brian Oliver provided a draft URL for
restoring information about closed review. CESG appreciated the approach
showed in that draft URL .</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Suggestion is to remove column allowing
to retrieve only NASA RIDs, which is misleading. </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Can the NASA system be extended to all
Agency RIDs.? <u>Wallace to check with James and the Secretariat.</u> Agencies
RIDs can not be inserted one by one. A batch process is needed.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">or Can we wait until the new RID System
is deployed ? When ?</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">To be discussed at the next CESG meeting</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b><u>AOB</u></b></font>
<ul>
<li><font size=2 face="sans-serif">CESG Chair has suggested to discuss
the OMG - CCSDS liaison during the next face-2-face CESG meeting.</font></ul>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Logistics for San Antonio: </font>
<ol>
<li value=1><font size=2 face="sans-serif">David Ross distributed the allocation
of rooms to the WGs, SLS SLP and SIS DTN WGs have some overlaps, which
needs to be solved.</font>
<li value=2><font size=2 face="sans-serif">CESG meeting will last from
08:30 until,18:00 hrs. SLS AD has to leave on Monday around 3 pm. SLS DAD
will attend the whole meeting.</font>
<li value=3><font size=2 face="sans-serif">P. Liebrecht (NASA) will address
the Opening Plenary (Monday 8th May)</font></ol><PRE>This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
</PRE>