From thomas.gannett at tgannett.net Sat Feb 1 12:00:07 2014 From: thomas.gannett at tgannett.net (CCSDS Secretariat) Date: Sat Feb 1 11:58:58 2014 Subject: [CMC Alert] New CMC Polls Message-ID: <52ed2816.ca5e8c0a.20d1.1095@mx.google.com> Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 14.0 MIMEDIR//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:PUBLISH X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE BEGIN:VEVENT CATEGORIES:Orange Category CLASS:PUBLIC CREATED:20140201T165503Z DESCRIPTION:- CMC-P-2014-01-001 Authorization to release CCSDS A02.1-Y-4\, Organization and Processes for the Consultative Committee for Space Data S ystems (Yellow Book\, Issue 4) and related documents\n- CMC-P-2014-02-001 Authorization to publish CCSDS 414.0-G-2\, Pseudo-Noise (PN) Ranging Syste ms (Green Book\, Issue 2)\n- CMC-P-2014-02-002 Authorization to publish CC SDS 414.1-B-2\, Pseudo-Noise (PN) Ranging Systems (Blue Book\, Issue 2)\n - CMC-P-2014-02-003 Authorization to publish CCSDS 521.1-B-1\, Mission Op erations Common Object Model (Blue Book\, Issue 1)\n- CMC-P-2014-02-004 Au thorization to publish CCSDS 651.1-B-1\, Producer-Archive Interface Speci fication (PAIS) (Blue Book\, Issue 1)\n DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20140218 DTSTAMP:20140201T165503Z DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20140217 LAST-MODIFIED:20140201T165503Z PRIORITY:5 SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=en-us:CMC Poll Closure TRANSP:TRANSPARENT UID:040000008200E00074C5B7101A82E0080000000030C60A3EAE1ECF01000000000000000 0100000007C4BC0EFF5AC944ABD793A4EACD46DFB X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

- \; \; \; \; \; \; CMC-P-2014-01-001 Authorization to release CCSDS A02.1-Y-4\, Organizatio n and Processes for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (Yel low Book\, Issue 4) and related documents

\n\n

- \; \; \; \; \; \; CMC-P-2014-02-001 Authorization to publish CCSDS 414.0-G-2 \, Pseudo-Noise (PN) Ranging Systems (Green Book\, Issue 2)< SPAN LANG="en-us">

\n\n

- \; \; \; \; \; \; CMC-P-2014-02-002 Authorization to publi sh CCSDS 414.1-B-2\, \; Pseudo-Noise (PN) Ranging Systems (Blue Book\, Issue 2)

\n\n

- \; \; \; \; \;&nbs p\; CMC-P-2014-02-00 3 Authorization to publish CCSDS 521.1-B-1\, \; Mission Operations Com mon Object Model (Blue Book\, Issue 1)

\n\n

- \;&nb sp\; \; \; \; \; CMC-P-2014-02-004 Authorization to publish CCSDS 651.1-B-1\,& nbsp\; Producer-Archive Interface Specification (PAIS) (Blue Book\, Issue 1)

CMC-P-2014-01-001 Authorization to release CCSDS A02.1-Y-4\, Organizat ion and Processes for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (Y ellow Book\, Issue 4) and related documents

\n\n\n X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:FREE X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1 X-MICROSOFT-DISALLOW-COUNTER:FALSE X-MS-OLK-CONFTYPE:0 BEGIN:VALARM TRIGGER:-PT1080M ACTION:DISPLAY DESCRIPTION:Reminder END:VALARM END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR From ccsds_techsupport at aiaa.org Fri Feb 14 20:57:16 2014 From: ccsds_techsupport at aiaa.org (ccsds techsupport) Date: Fri Feb 14 21:16:52 2014 Subject: [CMC Alert] New CMC Poll Message-ID: Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: CMC Poll Closure.ics Type: text/calendar Size: 1275 bytes Desc: CMC Poll Closure.ics Url : http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc-exec/attachments/20140215/6ef17906/CMCPollClosure.bin From thomas.gannett at tgannett.net Wed Feb 26 09:10:46 2014 From: thomas.gannett at tgannett.net (CCSDS Secretariat) Date: Wed Feb 26 09:10:34 2014 Subject: [CMC Alert] Proposed Disposition of Poll Conditions Message-ID: <530df5e7.cd62e00a.01b5.3260@mx.google.com> Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Proposed Dispositions to Poll Conditions.doc Type: application/msword Size: 35840 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc-exec/attachments/20140226/128b2a28/ProposedDispositionstoPollConditions-0001.doc From Nestor.Peccia at esa.int Wed Feb 26 19:50:23 2014 From: Nestor.Peccia at esa.int (Nestor.Peccia@esa.int) Date: Wed Feb 26 19:50:29 2014 Subject: [CMC Alert] Proposed Disposition of Poll Conditions In-Reply-To: <530df5e7.cd62e00a.01b5.3260@mx.google.com> References: <530df5e7.cd62e00a.01b5.3260@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <19669_1393462255_530E8BEF_19669_8450_1_OFD1D4D4E8.38589267-ONC1257C8B.008101FE-C1257C8C.00049D7B@esa.int> Tom I believe that there exists a problem in the way you recommend to follow, in order to save Agenda time in the next physical meeting. You have discussed and agreed YB text modifications to satisfy ADs / CMC members' conditions without seeking prior consensus at CESG level, As CESG Chair, I do not fully agree with some of your (and some ADs) suggestions. Even if (according to your new text) the CESG chair has no vote possibility, as MOIMS AD I have approved an YB, that now has been changed and is seeking approval without re-polling. If a new poll is issued, I will have the possibility to set my conditions to your new proposed text. I do not agree that the CESG Chairs do not vote. It is not usual, but it has happen in the past. This is the reason why we have the option "other" in the CESG poll. It is there to be used in atypical situations as the "last" solution. In case the CESG Chairs could not vote, I would like to have a discussion about the inclusion of a "veto" option after a CESG poll. CMC conditions and its related changes needs to be discussed also at CESG level. I have some observations on your recommendations. I firmly believe that we need to discuss these issues during the CESG / CMC meeting. ciao nestor This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender. Please consider the environment before printing this email. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc-exec/attachments/20140227/cce8f63a/attachment.html From Nestor.Peccia at esa.int Wed Feb 26 19:50:23 2014 From: Nestor.Peccia at esa.int (Nestor.Peccia@esa.int) Date: Wed Feb 26 19:50:39 2014 Subject: [CMC Alert] Proposed Disposition of Poll Conditions In-Reply-To: <530df5e7.cd62e00a.01b5.3260@mx.google.com> References: <530df5e7.cd62e00a.01b5.3260@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <4917_1393462256_530E8BF0_4917_7921_1_3670_1393462257_530E8BF1_3670_9207_1_OFD1D4D4E8.38589267-ONC1257C8B.008101FE-C1257C8C.00049DB9@esa.int> Tom I believe that there exists a problem in the way you recommend to follow, in order to save Agenda time in the next physical meeting. You have discussed and agreed YB text modifications to satisfy ADs / CMC members' conditions without seeking prior consensus at CESG level, In fact you are only copying the CESG, assuming that the issue is closed at our level with "your suggested way forward". As CESG Chair, I do not fully agree with some of your (and some ADs) suggestions. Even if (according to your new text) the CESG chair has no vote possibility, as MOIMS AD I have approved an YB, that now has been changed and is seeking approval without re-polling. If a new poll is issued, I will have the possibility to set my conditions "as MOIMS AD" to your new proposed text. I do not agree that the CESG Chairs do not vote. It is not usual, but it has happened in the past. This is the reason why we have the option "other" in the CESG poll. It is there to be used in atypical situations as the "last" solution. In case the CESG Chairs could not vote, I would like to have a discussion about the inclusion of a CESG Chairs "veto" option after a CESG poll. CMC conditions and its related changes needs to be discussed also at CESG level. I have some observations on your suggested modifications. I firmly believe that we need to discuss these issues during the CESG / CMC meeting. ciao nestor This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender. Please consider the environment before printing this email. This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender. Please consider the environment before printing this email. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc-exec/attachments/20140227/83535f0c/attachment.htm From Nestor.Peccia at esa.int Wed Feb 26 19:52:44 2014 From: Nestor.Peccia at esa.int (Nestor.Peccia@esa.int) Date: Thu Feb 27 01:52:00 2014 Subject: [CMC Alert] Proposed Disposition of Poll Conditions In-Reply-To: <530df5e7.cd62e00a.01b5.3260@mx.google.com> References: <530df5e7.cd62e00a.01b5.3260@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <4917_1393483945_530EE0A9_4917_10938_1_3670_1393462397_530E8C7D_3670_9215_1_OFD1D4D4E8.38589267-ONC1257C8B.008101FE-C1257C8C.0004D4A7@esa.int> Tom I believe that there exists a problem in the way you recommend to follow, in order to save Agenda time in the next physical meeting. You have discussed and agreed Org & Proc YB text modifications to satisfy ADs / CMC members' conditions without seeking prior consensus at CESG level, In fact you are only copying the CESG, assuming that the issue is closed at our level with "your suggested way forward". As CESG Chair, I do not fully agree with some of your (and probably some ADs) suggestions. Even if (according to your new text) the CESG chair has no vote possibility, as MOIMS AD I have approved an YB, that now has been changed and you are seeking approval without re-polling. If a new poll is issued, I will have the possibility to set my conditions "as MOIMS AD" to your new proposed text. I do not agree that the CESG Chairs do not vote. It is not usual, but it has happened in the past. This is the reason why we have the option "other" in the CESG poll. It is there to be used in non-typical situations as the "last" solution. In case the CESG Chairs could not vote, I would like to have a discussion about the inclusion of a CESG Chairs "veto" option after a CESG poll. There are also other possibilities. CMC conditions and its related changes needs to be discussed also at CESG level. I have some observations on your suggested modifications. I firmly believe that we need to discuss these issues during the CESG / CMC meeting. ciao nestor This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender. Please consider the environment before printing this email. This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender. Please consider the environment before printing this email. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc-exec/attachments/20140227/f8980ed9/attachment.html From Jean-Marc.Soula at cnes.fr Thu Feb 27 03:33:43 2014 From: Jean-Marc.Soula at cnes.fr (Soula Jean-Marc) Date: Thu Feb 27 03:33:17 2014 Subject: [CMC Alert] Proposed Disposition of Poll Conditions In-Reply-To: <530df5e7.cd62e00a.01b5.3260@mx.google.com> References: <530df5e7.cd62e00a.01b5.3260@mx.google.com> Message-ID: Bonjour I disagree with the disposal of CNES-1 and I believe a discussion is required on SEA-1 and SIS-1, if the proposed disposals are accepted by the authors of those two RIDs or after the CESG concludes on this. On CNES-1, my suggestion was a voting right of 2+12 in CESG while I can now interpret the disposal as some 0+6. I don't believe this can be solved via emails... So, for me, I would select option 2: 2) the proposed dispositions are NOT acceptable and release of the document should be delayed until after discussions take place at the upcoming "CMC meeting". However, I believe the said CMC meeting may be before April, via webex-telco, if estimated urgent to finalize this version before the S14 WG meetings. I leave ESA, DLR and JAXA respond on their items. Are the two Areas items the only comments / disposals ... or are those the only two brought to the attention of the CMC ? Best regards Jean-Marc Soula CNES - DCT/OP/C-STA Advisor, GN Operations 18 Avenue Edouard Belin 31401 Toulouse Cedex 9 - France Tel.: +33 (0)5 61 2 74647 Fax.: +33 (0)5 61 2 73135 Email: Jean-Marc.Soula@cnes.fr De : cmc-exec-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org [mailto:cmc-exec-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org] De la part de CCSDS Secretariat Envoy? : mercredi 26 f?vrier 2014 15:11 ? : CMC-exec@mailman.ccsds.org Cc : cesg@mailman.ccsds.org Objet : [CMC Alert] Proposed Disposition of Poll Conditions Importance : Haute Dear CMC Members: The recent joint CESG/CMC polls to approve release of CCSDS A02.1-Y-4, Organization and Processes for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (Yellow Book, Issue 4) closed with conditions. While it is possible to devote valuable agenda time at the next CMC meeting to discussion of these conditions, I have nevertheless proposed dispositions that could allow release of the document prior to the meeting (see attached file). The CESG members who voted for conditional approval have already agreed to the proposed dispositions. If the CMC members who voted to adopt provisionally were to agree to the proposed dispositions of both the CMC provisions and CESG conditions, there would be no need to add an agenda item to the upcoming meeting to resolve the issues. Therefore the CMC members who voted to adopt provisionally, i.e., the CNES, DLR, ESA, and JAXA delegates, should "reply all" to this e-mail to indicated one of the following options: 1) the proposed dispositions are acceptable, and release of the document should proceed; or 2) the proposed dispositions are NOT acceptable and release of the document should be delayed until after discussions take place at the upcoming CMC meeting. Other CMC members should respond only if they object to releasing the document prior to the meetings. Best regards, Tom Gannett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc-exec/attachments/20140227/55eafc33/attachment-0001.htm From Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int Thu Feb 27 04:10:38 2014 From: Gian.Paolo.Calzolari at esa.int (Gian.Paolo.Calzolari@esa.int) Date: Thu Feb 27 10:25:02 2014 Subject: [CMC Alert] Re: [CESG] Proposed Disposition of Poll Conditions In-Reply-To: <530df5e7.cd62e00a.01b5.3260@mx.google.com> References: <530df5e7.cd62e00a.01b5.3260@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <28322_1393493256_530F0508_28322_8464_9_16063_1393492271_530F012F_16063_6071_1_OF4E985229.21140482-ONC1257C8C.003243F6-C1257C8C.003269C4@esa.int> Tom, I think the SLS comments are not addressed. Despite they were not stated as "conditions" I think it would be worth to address them to have a common understanding in CESG and CMC. Thank you and regards Gian Paolo From: CCSDS Secretariat To: CMC-exec@mailman.ccsds.org, Cc: cesg@mailman.ccsds.org Date: 26/02/2014 15:14 Subject: [CESG] Proposed Disposition of Poll Conditions Sent by: cesg-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org Dear CMC Members: The recent joint CESG/CMC polls to approve release of CCSDS A02.1-Y-4, Organization and Processes for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (Yellow Book, Issue 4) closed with conditions. While it is possible to devote valuable agenda time at the next CMC meeting to discussion of these conditions, I have nevertheless proposed dispositions that could allow release of the document prior to the meeting (see attached file). The CESG members who voted for conditional approval have already agreed to the proposed dispositions. If the CMC members who voted to adopt provisionally were to agree to the proposed dispositions of both the CMC provisions and CESG conditions, there would be no need to add an agenda item to the upcoming meeting to resolve the issues. Therefore the CMC members who voted to adopt provisionally, i.e., the CNES, DLR, ESA, and JAXA delegates, should "reply all" to this e-mail to indicated one of the following options: 1) the proposed dispositions are acceptable, and release of the document should proceed; or 2) the proposed dispositions are NOT acceptable and release of the document should be delayed until after discussions take place at the upcoming CMC meeting. Other CMC members should respond only if they object to releasing the document prior to the meetings. Best regards, Tom Gannett[attachment "Proposed Dispositions to Poll Conditions.doc" deleted by Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA] _______________________________________________ CESG mailing list CESG@mailman.ccsds.org http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender. Please consider the environment before printing this email. This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender. Please consider the environment before printing this email. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc-exec/attachments/20140227/7acfeb53/attachment.html From thomas.gannett at tgannett.net Thu Feb 27 16:14:29 2014 From: thomas.gannett at tgannett.net (CCSDS Secretariat) Date: Thu Feb 27 16:13:59 2014 Subject: [CMC Alert] New CMC Polls Message-ID: <530faab4.2b328c0a.4a62.59cd@mx.google.com> Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 14.0 MIMEDIR//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:PUBLISH X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE BEGIN:VEVENT CATEGORIES:Orange Category CLASS:PUBLIC CREATED:20140227T211201Z DESCRIPTION:- CMC-P-2014-02-006 Authorization to publish CCSDS 722.1-M-1\, Operation of CFDP over Encapsulation Service (Magenta Book\, Issue 1)\n- C MC-P-2014-02-007 Authorization to publish CCSDS 652.1-M-2\, Requirements f or Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Candidate Trustworthy Digit al Repositories (Magenta Book\, Issue 2)\n- CMC-P-2014-02-008 Authorizatio n to publish CCSDS 871.2-M-1\, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services???Dev ice Virtualization Service (Magenta Book\, Issue 1)\n DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20140314 DTSTAMP:20140227T211201Z DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20140313 LAST-MODIFIED:20140227T211201Z PRIORITY:5 SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=en-us:CMC Poll Closure TRANSP:TRANSPARENT UID:040000008200E00074C5B7101A82E0080000000060E76D9CD633CF01000000000000000 010000000D40E476322450648A1C0799B4DA8E1E6 X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

- \; \; \; \; \; \; CMC-P-2014-02-006 Authorization to publish CCSDS 722.1-M-1\, Operation o f CFDP over Encapsulation Service (Magenta Book\, Issue 1)

\n\n
- \; \; \; \; \; \; CMC-P-2014-02-007 Authorization to publis h CCSDS 652.1-M-2\, Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certificat ion of Candidate Trustworthy Digital Repositories (Magenta Book\, Issue 2)
\n\n
- \; \; \; \; \; \; CMC-P-2014-02-008 Authori zation to publish CCSDS 871.2-M-1\, Spacecraft Onboard Interface Services ???Device Virtualization Service (Magenta Book\, Issue 1)
\n\n\n X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:FREE X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1 X-MICROSOFT-DISALLOW-COUNTER:FALSE X-MS-OLK-CONFTYPE:0 BEGIN:VALARM TRIGGER:-PT1080M ACTION:DISPLAY DESCRIPTION:Reminder END:VALARM END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR From NickT at aiaa.org Thu Feb 27 17:14:36 2014 From: NickT at aiaa.org (Nick Tongson) Date: Thu Feb 27 17:28:21 2014 Subject: [CMC Alert] Draft minutes from past meetings - Review Message-ID: Skipped content of type multipart/related-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: March 2013 Midterm telecon.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 227121 bytes Desc: March 2013 Midterm telecon.pdf Url : http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc-exec/attachments/20140227/384d34eb/March2013Midtermtelecon-0001.pdf -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: CMC Draft Minutes Bordeaux Spring 2013v2.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 251281 bytes Desc: CMC Draft Minutes Bordeaux Spring 2013v2.pdf Url : http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc-exec/attachments/20140227/384d34eb/CMCDraftMinutesBordeauxSpring2013v2-0001.pdf -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2013-09-06 CMC MidtermTelecon Draft Minutes.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 256118 bytes Desc: 2013-09-06 CMC MidtermTelecon Draft Minutes.pdf Url : http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc-exec/attachments/20140227/384d34eb/2013-09-06CMCMidtermTeleconDraftMinutes-0001.pdf From Martin.Pilgram at dlr.de Fri Feb 28 05:55:11 2014 From: Martin.Pilgram at dlr.de (Martin.Pilgram@dlr.de) Date: Fri Feb 28 05:54:48 2014 Subject: AW: [CMC Alert] Proposed Disposition of Poll Conditions In-Reply-To: <530df5e7.cd62e00a.01b5.3260@mx.google.com> References: <530df5e7.cd62e00a.01b5.3260@mx.google.com> Message-ID: Tom, After having seen the other comments, DLR wants to go with solution 2. We should arrange a discussion in the next CMC meeting. We have some concerns on the proposed changes for the SEA, SIS items. But it makes no sense to discuss it without SEA and SIS people. And at least from the Gian-Paolo mail, it seemed that there are more comments from the area managers, which should be discussed with them. Regards Martin -------------------------- Deutsches Zentrum f?r Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR) German Aerospace Center Space Operations and Astronaut Training | Kontrollzentrum und Bodenstationen | Oberpfaffenhofen | 82234 Wessling | Germany Martin Pilgram Telephone +49 8153 28-1266 | Telefax +49 8153 28-1456 | martin.pilgram@dlr.de www.DLR.de Von: cmc-exec-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org [mailto:cmc-exec-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org] Im Auftrag von CCSDS Secretariat Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2014 15:11 An: CMC-exec@mailman.ccsds.org Cc: cesg@mailman.ccsds.org Betreff: [CMC Alert] Proposed Disposition of Poll Conditions Wichtigkeit: Hoch Dear CMC Members: The recent joint CESG/CMC polls to approve release of CCSDS A02.1-Y-4, Organization and Processes for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (Yellow Book, Issue 4) closed with conditions. While it is possible to devote valuable agenda time at the next CMC meeting to discussion of these conditions, I have nevertheless proposed dispositions that could allow release of the document prior to the meeting (see attached file). The CESG members who voted for conditional approval have already agreed to the proposed dispositions. If the CMC members who voted to adopt provisionally were to agree to the proposed dispositions of both the CMC provisions and CESG conditions, there would be no need to add an agenda item to the upcoming meeting to resolve the issues. Therefore the CMC members who voted to adopt provisionally, i.e., the CNES, DLR, ESA, and JAXA delegates, should "reply all" to this e-mail to indicated one of the following options: 1) the proposed dispositions are acceptable, and release of the document should proceed; or 2) the proposed dispositions are NOT acceptable and release of the document should be delayed until after discussions take place at the upcoming CMC meeting. Other CMC members should respond only if they object to releasing the document prior to the meetings. Best regards, Tom Gannett -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ccsds.org/pipermail/cmc-exec/attachments/20140228/e9b56fd6/attachment.htm