<span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Dear Peter,</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">The comment form
Jaxa states:</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif"><i>Section 6.1.4.4
(Page 6-5) states "…Blue Books are required to be prototyped before
final approval and publication…" Resources of Prototype 1 and
Prototype 2 are "Not required" for this 5-year review, however,
there is no statement in the CCSDS A02.1-Y-4 whether the prototype tests
are required for the New Projects of the 5-year review. Will the
necessity be identified in the course of the review process?</i></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">I agree that the
matter is already covered in CCSDS YB, Org & Proc, however, may be
a simple change to the text would avoid misunderstanding in the future.
For instance </span><span style=" font-size:10pt;color:red;font-family:sans-serif">(in
red)</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">:</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:sans-serif">6.1.4.4
As a result of this difference in
prescriptive content between Blue and Magenta
books, Blue Books are required to be
prototyped before final approval and publication,
but Magenta Books are not required to be prototyped. </span><span style=" font-size:10pt;color:red;font-family:sans-serif">This
applies also to updates of Blue Books, if/when new features are introduced</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:sans-serif">.</span><span style=" font-size:15pt">
</span>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:sans-serif">6.2.7.2.1.1
Revisions of published normative documents shall follow the procedures
in 6.2.2 </span><span style=" font-size:10pt;color:red;font-family:sans-serif">and
6.2.6.</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Concerning the
question from Jaxa “….<i>Will the necessity be identified in the course
of the review process?”, </i>I think the answer is that the necessity
of prototyping can only be identified at the time the new project gets
established, in that the relevant resources must be identified – and requested
- via project approval. Therefore, this necessity cannot be identified
during the review process.</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">Kind regards,<br>
Margherita</span>
<br>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:sans-serif">--------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</span><span style=" font-size:8pt;color:#00a1e0;font-family:Verdana"><b>Margherita
di Giulio</b></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:8pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:Verdana">Ground
Station Systems Division</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:8pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:Verdana">Backend
Software Section (OPS-GSB)</span>
<br>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:8pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:Verdana"><b>European
Space Agency ESA/ESOC</b><br>
Robert-Bosch-Str. 5<br>
D-64293 Darmstadt - Germany<br>
Tel: +49-6151-902779<br>
e-mail: Margherita.di.Giulio@esa.int</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif"><br>
<br>
</span>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">From:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"Shames,
Peter M (US 312B)" <peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">To:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"Margherita.di.Giulio@esa.int"
<Margherita.di.Giulio@esa.int></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Cc:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">"CESG
-- CCSDS-Engineering SteeringGroup(cesg@mailman.ccsds.org)(cesg@mailman.ccsds.org)"
<cesg@mailman.ccsds.org></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Date:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">27/08/2020
02:02</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:sans-serif">Subject:
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:sans-serif">Re:
[EXTERNAL] Fw: [Cesg-all] Results of CMC Polls</span>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Dear
Margherita,</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">This
is already covered in the CCSDS YB, org & Proc, under the subject of
"Periodic Review":</span></p>
<br><span style=" font-size:12pt;color:#0082bf"><b>6.2.7 PERIODIC REVIEW
</b></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:12pt;color:#0082bf"><b>6.2.7.1 General </b></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:12pt;color:#0082bf">CCSDS documents shall undergo
periodic review within the Area no later than five years after issue and
every five years subsequently. Periodic review shall result in reconfirmation,
revision, or retirement to CCSDS historical status. </span>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">If
the document is just reconfirmed then there is no need for a new protoyping
effort. If the document is revised in any significant way, especially
is there are any changes to protocols, behavior, PDUs, data formats, signaling,
then that falls under the "Revisions" clause:</span></p>
<br><span style=" font-size:12pt;color:#0082bf"><b>6.2.7.2 Changes to Documents
</b></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:12pt;color:#0082bf"><b>6.2.7.2.1 Revisions
of Normative Documents </b></span>
<br><span style=" font-size:12pt;color:#0082bf"><b>6.2.7.2.1.1 </b>Revisions
of published normative documents shall follow the procedures in 6.2.2.
</span>
<br><span style=" font-size:12pt;color:#0082bf"><b>6.2.7.2.1.2 </b>The
color designation for draft revisions of normative documents shall be “Pink”
(rather than “Red”). </span>
<br><span style=" font-size:12pt;color:#0082bf"><b>6.2.7.2.1.3 </b>In cases
where only limited discrete changes are proposed to a published normative
document, only the pages containing substantive changes (“Pink Sheets”)
may be released for review. </span>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">The
procedures in sec 6.2.2 are those for normal, normative, document processing,
which include prototyping and generation of a test report. I believe
that this is all clearly enough stated and that no changes to CCSDS A02.1-Y-4
are needed.</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Do
you concur?</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">Thanks,
Peter</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><b>From:
</b>"Margherita.di.Giulio@esa.int" <Margherita.di.Giulio@esa.int><b><br>
Date: </b>Wednesday, August 26, 2020 at 7:16 AM<b><br>
To: </b>Peter Shames <peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov><b><br>
Cc: </b>CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec <cesg@mailman.ccsds.org><b><br>
Subject: </b>[EXTERNAL] Fw: [Cesg-all] Results of CMC Polls</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial">Dear
Peter,</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial"><br>
the attached notification contains two comments from Jaxa, where
they query about Prototype activities for Blue Books under 5-years review
: the point they make is that CCSDS A02.1-Y-4 does not explicitly mandate
prototype testing for books under 5-years review. Is this need to
be established e.g. during the review process itself ?</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
<br>
</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial"><br>
Can you please take a look at the comment ? In case some text needs to
be introduced in CCSDS A02.1-Y-4, can you propose something to CESG
?</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial"><br>
Thank you, kind regards,<br>
Margherita</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> <br>
</span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial"><br>
--------------------------------------------------------------</span><span style=" font-size:8pt;color:#00a1e0;font-family:Verdana"><b><br>
Margherita di Giulio</b></span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span><span style=" font-size:8pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:Verdana"><br>
Ground Station Systems Division</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span><span style=" font-size:8pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:Verdana"><br>
Backend Software Section (OPS-GSB)</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
<br>
<br>
</span><span style=" font-size:8pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:Verdana"><b><br>
European Space Agency ESA/ESOC</b><br>
Robert-Bosch-Str. 5<br>
D-64293 Darmstadt - Germany<br>
Tel: +49-6151-902779<br>
e-mail: Margherita.di.Giulio@esa.int</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:Arial"><br>
</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#800080;font-family:Arial"><br>
----- Forwarded by Margherita di Giulio/esoc/ESA on 26/08/2020 15:56 -----</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
<br>
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:Arial"><br>
From: </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial">"Stafford
Laura (BTAS)" <Laura.Stafford@btas.com></span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:Arial"><br>
To: </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial">"Blackwood,
Michael D via CMC" <CMC@mailman.ccsds.org></span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:Arial"><br>
Cc: </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial">"Blackwood,
Michael D via CESG-All" <cesg-all@mailman.ccsds.org></span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:Arial"><br>
Date: </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial">25/08/2020
18:19</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:Arial"><br>
Subject: </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial">[Cesg-all]
Results of CMC Polls</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span><span style=" font-size:9pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:Arial"><br>
Sent by: </span><span style=" font-size:9pt;font-family:Arial">"CESG-All"
<cesg-all-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org></span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span></p>
<div align=center>
<hr noshade></div>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:240px"><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
<br>
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2020-07-002</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
Approval of New Projects in the 5.04 Space Link Protocols WG<br>
<br>
Results of CMC poll beginning 7 July 2020 and ending 21 July 2020:<br>
<br>
Adopt: 8 (100%) (CNES, CNSA, CSA, DLR, ESA, INPE, JAXA, NASA)<br>
Adopt Provisionally: 0 (0%)<br>
Reject: 0 (0%)<br>
Reject with Comments: 0 (0%)<br>
<br>
Results are based on responses from 8 out of 11 members (72.72%).<br>
<br>
No response was received from the following Agencies:<br>
<br>
ASI</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
RFSA</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
UKSA</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> <br>
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
Comments from JAXA:</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
This comment(/inquiry) is not for this 5-year review Project, but the CCSDS
A02.1-Y-4.<br>
<br>
Section 6.1.4.4 (Page 6-5) states "…Blue Books are required to be
prototyped before final approval and publication…" Resources
of Prototype 1 and Prototype 2 are "Not required" for this 5-year
review, however, there is no statement in the CCSDS A02.1-Y-4 whether the
prototype tests are required for the New Projects of the 5-year review.
Will the necessity be identified in the course of the review process?<br>
<br>
Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted<br>
Resulting CMC Resolution:
CMC-R-2020-08-008<br>
Inferred Secretariat Action:
Approve Project - Done & Working Group Chair address
Comments from JAXA.</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
<br>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *<br>
<br>
CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2020-07-003</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
Approval of New Project in the 5.09 Space Data Link Security WG<br>
<br>
Results of CMC poll beginning 7 July 2020 and ending 21 July 2020:<br>
<br>
Adopt: 8 (100%) (CNES, CNSA, CSA, DLR, ESA, INPE, JAXA, NASA)<br>
Adopt Provisionally: 0 (0%)<br>
Reject: 0 (0%)<br>
Reject with Comments: 0 (0%)<br>
<br>
Results are based on responses from 8 out of 11 members (72.72%).<br>
<br>
No response was received from the following Agencies:<br>
<br>
ASI</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
RFSA</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
UKSA</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> <br>
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
Comments from JAXA:</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
This comment(/inquiry) is not for this 5-year review Project, but the CCSDS
A02.1-Y-4.<br>
<br>
Section 6.1.4.4 (Page 6-5) states "…Blue Books are required to be
prototyped before final approval and publication…" Resources
of Prototype 1 and Prototype 2 are "Not required" for this 5-year
review, however, there is no statement in the CCSDS A02.1-Y-4 whether the
prototype tests are required for the New Projects of the 5-year review.
Will the necessity be identified in the course of the review process?<br>
<br>
Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted<br>
Resulting CMC Resolution:
CMC-R-2020-08-009<br>
Inferred Secretariat Action:
Approve Project - Done & Working Group Chair address
Comments from JAXA.</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
<br>
<br>
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2020-07-004</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
CESG Escalation to CMC about Unresolved CESG Poll<br>
<br>
Results of CMC poll beginning 15 July 2020 and ending 29 July 2020:<br>
<br>
Adopt: 8 (100%) (CNES, CNSA, CSA, DLR, ESA, INPE, JAXA, NASA, UKSA)<br>
Adopt Provisionally: 0 (0%)<br>
Reject: 0 (0%)<br>
Reject with Comments: 0 (0%)<br>
<br>
Results are based on responses from 9 out of 11 members (81.81%).<br>
<br>
No response was received from the following Agencies:<br>
<br>
ASI</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
RFSA</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> <br>
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
Comments from ESA:</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
ESA agree to release the book for Agency Review<br>
<br>
Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted<br>
Resulting CMC Resolution:
CMC-R-2020-08-010<br>
Inferred Secretariat Action:
The Poll conditions raised by the ADs shall be removed, and
the book CCSDS 131.3-P-1.1, shall go ahead to Agency Review. </span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
<br>
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2020-06-005</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri">
</span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
CMC-P-2020-06-005 Charter Modification for the Multispectral Hyperspectral
Data Compression (SLS-MHDC) Working Group<br>
<br>
Results of CMC poll beginning 25 June 2020 and ending 9 July 2020:<br>
<br>
Adopt: 8 (100%) (ASI, CNES, CNSA, CSA, DLR, ESA, INPE, JAXA,)<br>
Adopt Provisionally: 0 (0%)<br>
Reject: 0 (0%)<br>
Reject with Comments: 0 (0%)<br>
<br>
Results are based on responses from 8 out of 11 members (72.72%).<br>
<br>
No response was received from the following Agencies:<br>
<br>
NASA</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
RFSA</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
UKSA</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"> </span><span style=" font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
<br>
Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted<br>
Resulting CMC Resolution:
CMC-R-2020-08-011<br>
Inferred Secretariat Action:
Approve Charter Once WG Chair Makes Edits - Done </span><span style=" font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
<br>
<br>
</span></p>
<div align=center>
<hr></div>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:240px"><span style=" font-size:8pt;color:red;font-family:Arial"><br>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: </span><span style=" font-size:8pt;color:#5f5f5f;font-family:Arial"><i>The
contents of this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, or otherwise
protected against disclosure or dissemination. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message, any dissemination, distribution or copying is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
delete all copies from your computer system. </i></span><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CESG-All mailing list<br>
CESG-All@mailman.ccsds.org</span><span style=" font-size:11pt;color:blue;font-family:Calibri"><u><br>
</u></span><a href="https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!dJeBXBZ_FfE3ud8YCTVQsvPU4TDjAkQ03Dxpm3VVEALUfHZawp50yxAbjvmP0N8i_19O8T4f$"><span style=" font-size:10pt;color:blue;font-family:Courier New"><u>https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg-all</u></span></a></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New">This
message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain
proprietary information and/or</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New">protected
content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is
prohibited. If you have received</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New">this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate
organisational measures to protect</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"><span style=" font-size:10pt;font-family:Courier New">personal
data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection
Officer (dpo@esa.int).</span></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"></p>
<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-Bottom:0px"></p>
<PRE>This message is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain proprietary information and/or
protected content. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, retention or dissemination is prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. ESA applies appropriate organisational measures to protect
personal data, in case of data privacy queries, please contact the ESA Data Protection Officer (dpo@esa.int).
</PRE>