<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Peter,<br>
<br>
With your acceptance of Richard's comments, SOIS area was good
with the document. Sorry if this was not clear.<br>
<br>
Kind regards,<br>
<br>
Jonathan<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 2/20/2019 3:45 PM, Shames, Peter M (312B) wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:C38138C3-E330-47E8-BC9A-970C6223CD6B@jpl.nasa.gov">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Dear MOIMS & SOIS colleagues,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>I requested feedback on this by 22
Feb 2019. Are you going to have replies and feedback by
then? I want to get this off my plate.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>For those who have lost the thread,
this is intended as the resolution for the Condition raised
on CESG-P-2018-05-010, see
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://public.ccsds.org/polls/Lists/CESGP201805010/AllItems.aspx">https://public.ccsds.org/polls/Lists/CESGP201805010/AllItems.aspx</a>.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Thanks, Peter</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>From: </span>
</b><span>Peter Shames <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Peter.M.Shames@jpl.nasa.gov"><Peter.M.Shames@jpl.nasa.gov></a><br>
<b>Date: </b>Friday, February 8, 2019 at 5:04 PM<br>
<b>To: </b>Mario Merri <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Mario.Merri@esa.int"><Mario.Merri@esa.int></a>,
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Mehran.Sarkarati@esa.int">"Mehran.Sarkarati@esa.int"</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Mehran.Sarkarati@esa.int"><Mehran.Sarkarati@esa.int></a>, Sam Cooper
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:sam@brightascension.com"><sam@brightascension.com></a>, Roger Thompson
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:roger.s.thompson@btinternet.com"><roger.s.thompson@btinternet.com></a>, Dan Smith
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:danford.s.smith@nasa.gov"><danford.s.smith@nasa.gov></a>, "Wilmot, Jonathan J.
(GSFC-5820)" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jonathan.j.wilmot@nasa.gov"><jonathan.j.wilmot@nasa.gov></a>, "Rakow,
Glenn P. (GSFC-5610)" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:glenn.p.rakow@nasa.gov"><glenn.p.rakow@nasa.gov></a>,
Richard Melvin <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Richard.Melvin@scisys.co.uk"><Richard.Melvin@scisys.co.uk></a><br>
<b>Cc: </b>SEA-SA <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:sea-sa@mailman.ccsds.org"><sea-sa@mailman.ccsds.org></a>, CCSDS
Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:cesg@mailman.ccsds.org"><cesg@mailman.ccsds.org></a><br>
<b>Subject: </b>SEA SAWG proposed edits to the SOIS
document, CCSDS 870.10-Y-1, MO Services and SOIS
Electronic Data Sheets</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Dear All,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>As reported during the CESG Telecon
on 7 Feb 2019, the Systems Engineering Area (SEA), using
resources of the Systems Architecture Working Group (SAWG),
has completed a review of the SOIS document, CCSDS
870.10-Y-1, MO Services and SOIS Electronic Data Sheets and
proposed a set of updates to resolve differences of opinion
between SOIS and MOIMS and clarify the relationships. This
result was derived using meeting and email discussions
within the SAWG and particularly with representatives of the
two different points of view (Roger Thompson and Ramon
Krosley) and the original author of the document (Richard
Melvin). Before sending this document out more widely these
parties were polled and they concurred in this release, with
two minor issues noted. Those issues have been dealt with
in this version.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Three files are attached:</span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph">
<span>1)<span>
</span></span><span>A "clean" version with changes accepted,
but revised text left in
<span>red</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph">
<span>2)<span>
</span></span><span>A raw version with all of the tracked
changes visible</span></p>
<p class="MsoListParagraph">
<span>3)<span>
</span></span><span>A spreadsheet extracted from the marked
up PDF files, along with the audit trail of discussions
leading to resolution</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Since this is, in effect, a
cross-area "working group" of sorts I would like to ask all
of those who have a stake in this to review the document and
provide feedback in two weeks, by 22 Feb 2019. I'd like to
use a consensus process over email and am hoping we can wrap
this up quickly. We will still need to process the final
result through the CESG for approval to publish.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Thanks, Peter</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>