<font size=2 face="Arial">Dear Nestor,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">please find below my response to the points
raised by Osvaldo.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">Regards,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">__Mario</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Nestor.Peccia@esa.int</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"CESG -- CCSDS-Engineering
Steering Group(cesg@mailman.ccsds.org)(cesg@mailman.ccsds.org)" <cesg@mailman.ccsds.org></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">08/06/2017 15:41</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">[CESG] Fw: AW:
[CMC] CESG Report to CMC</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Sent by:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"CESG"
<cesg-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org></font>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Dear all,</font><font size=3> <br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
Please see your actions for clarification </font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif"><b>Your
final updates by Friday 9th June COB (USA PST).</b></font><font size=3>
<br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b><br>
I am leaving on Saturday afternoon for Sant Petersburg. I will produce
the last CESG presentation update by Saturday noon. </b></font><font size=3><br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b><br>
ciao</b></font><font size=3> </font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><b><br>
nestor</b></font><font size=3> </font>
<p><font size=2 face="Calibri">-----------------------------------------------------</font><font size=3>
</font>
<p><font size=2 color=#004080 face="Calibri">Page 3: I would delete the
SIS voice here, the problem is the secretariat, not the WG. I would not
blame the secretariat for the delays, there were contract problems and
some inconsistencies and 3 years delay is a little bit too much, but if
the WG is accepting that, we should not complain against the secretariat,
they are doing a great job. </font><font size=2 color=red face="Calibri">Nestor
to clarify</font><font size=3> </font>
<p><font size=2 color=#004080 face="Calibri">Page 8: What are the “data
quality” issues mentioned
</font><font size=2 color=red face="Calibri"><b>Peter to clarify</b></font><font size=3>
</font>
<p><font size=2 color=#004080 face="Calibri">Page 26: Are there any proposals
from the WG/agencies for new chair/deputy? </font><font size=2 color=red face="Calibri"><b>Erik
to clarify</b></font><font size=3> </font>
<p><font size=2 color=#004080 face="Calibri">Page 33: Is that a question
to IOAG or within the WG. What kind of file service is planned by the area.</font><font size=2 color=red face="Calibri"><b>
Erik to clarify </b></font>
<p><font size=2 color=#004080 face="Calibri">Page 36: Are the resources
for the second CFDP prototype still missing? Comments on page 39/49 </font><font size=2 color=red face="Calibri"><b>Scott
to clarify </b></font>
<p><font size=2 color=#004080 face="Calibri">Page 60: The WG requests the
CCSDS management to formalize the WG membership. Is there any proposal,
what a formalized membership could be? </font><font size=2 color=red face="Calibri"><b>
Mario to clarify</b></font><font size=3> </font>
<p><font size=3><b>MM>This point is covered by the proposed updates
to the YB. I will delete it from the presentation.</b></font>
<p><font size=2 color=#004080 face="Calibri">Page 63: What happened to
the Perturbation Message, which was a draft book and disappeared? </font><font size=2 color=red face="Calibri"><b>Mario
to clarify</b></font><font size=3> </font>
<p><font size=3><b>MM> The Spacecraft Perturbation Message project was
deleted upon request by the NAV WG of 13Jan17. This decision was based
on (a) the fact that the technical material that was once targeted for
the SPM is now being covered in some of the other Navigation WG documents,
and (b) leaving it in the NAV 5 Year Plan and Draft Project list creates
a false impression.</b></font>
<p><font size=2 color=#004080 face="Calibri">Page 66: Are there any priority
issues coming from the work of the IOAG MOSSG final report? </font><font size=2 color=red face="Calibri"><b>Mario
to clarify an please highlight that the MOSSG priorities are not taken
into consideration because are their opinion and not the official IOAG
output</b></font><font size=3> </font>
<p><font size=2 color=#004080 face="Calibri"> </font><font size=3><b>MM>So
far the MOSSG provided only informal information to the SM&C WG. It
is understood that the CCSDS shall consider in its planning only formal
priorities coming directly from the IOAG. This has not yet happened.</b></font>
<p>
<br><tt><font size=3>This message and any attachments are intended for
the use of the addressee or addressees only.<br>
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole
or in part) of its<br>
content is not permitted.<br>
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete
it from your system.<br>
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.<br>
<br>
Please consider the environment before printing this email.<br>
<br>
</font></tt><tt><font size=2>_______________________________________________<br>
CESG mailing list<br>
CESG@mailman.ccsds.org<br>
</font></tt><a href="https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg"><tt><font size=2>https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2><br>
</font></tt>
<br>
<br><PRE>This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
</PRE>