<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Peter it looks I was not able to get my point. </div><div id="AppleMailSignature">The main point is that I find a real problem that you cannot retrieve a red/pink book and the call for review. </div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br></div><div id="AppleMailSignature">For the RIDs one problem is that we only display NASA RIDs. This is a partial view and as such misleading. </div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>RIDs are discussed on WGs so I would find preferable to refer to WG activity. </div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br></div><div id="AppleMailSignature">Have a nice week end</div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br></div><div id="AppleMailSignature">Gippo</div><div id="AppleMailSignature"><br>Sent from my iPhone</div><div><br>On 20 Jan 2017, at 19:54, Shames, Peter M (312B) <<a href="mailto:peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov">peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Title" content="">
<meta name="Keywords" content="">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Courier New";
panose-1:2 7 3 9 2 2 5 2 4 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:sans-serif;
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Courier;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.msoIns
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-style-name:"";
text-decoration:underline;
color:teal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">I find it rather weird that we are having this discussion at all. CCSDS is an open organization. The reviews that we hold ask members of our agencies, and of observer agencies and associate
organizations, to review our documents and provide feedback. This is all an open and public process. The people who participate in it, for the most part, are professional and courteous and are also respectful of the process and each other. We do not see
the sorts of "flame wars" or derogatory discussions that are all too prevalent on social media.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Given that this whole process is open, and that the only "semi closed" part is the technical discussions that take place when we, within a working group, try to figure out how to disposition
the RIDs. At the end of that process the results of the disposition are again made public. That is a
<b><i>required</i></b> part of the process. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">What purpose will be served by hiding any of this? If people do not want to have their private opinions, as expressed in RIDs, made visible they can choose to word them in a way that will
bear public scrutiny.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">If there are doubts about how we have agreed to operate I suggest that you review the CSDS ORGANIZATION AND PROCESSES document, A02.1-Y-4. A simple search for "RID" and "disposition" will
pull up the relevant sections.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Thanks, Peter<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri;color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="font-family:Calibri;color:black">CESG <<a href="mailto:cesg-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org">cesg-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org</a>> on behalf of Gian Paolo Calzolari <<a href="mailto:Gian.Paolo.Calzolari@esa.int">Gian.Paolo.Calzolari@esa.int</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 6:32 AM<br>
<b>To: </b>CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG Exec <<a href="mailto:cesg@mailman.ccsds.org">cesg@mailman.ccsds.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[CESG] Is it correct what we show on the web for Recently Completed Reviews?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"sans-serif","serif"">Dear ALL,</span>
<br>
<span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"sans-serif","serif""> at </span>
<a href="https://public.ccsds.org/review/default.aspx"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"sans-serif","serif"">https://public.ccsds.org/review/default.aspx</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"sans-serif","serif""> we list the CCSDS
Review ongoing or completed.</span> <br>
<br>
<span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"sans-serif","serif"">AFter the recent web site updates, for the completed review we only show the RIDs (BTW, only those submitted by NASA via the web interface).</span>
<br>
<span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"sans-serif","serif"">Conversely it is impossible to access the old call for review including the related Red or Pink Book.</span>
<br>
<span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"sans-serif","serif"">Is this correct?</span>
<br>
<br>
<span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"sans-serif","serif"">My opinion is that -
<b>on the public page</b> - we should rather show what we asked (most important the red/pink books).</span>
<br>
<span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"sans-serif","serif"">Conversely the RIDs should be treated as more
<i>confidential </i>information normally limited to WG Members. However right now this is only affecting NASA so they should speak up on this. However it is also true that we the approach stays, in future all RIDs could be shown. Is this wanted by Agencies?</span>
<br>
<br>
<span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"sans-serif","serif"">CESG may discuss the matter in a one of the future webex meetings.</span>
<br>
<br>
<span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"sans-serif","serif"">Regards</span> <br>
<br>
<span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"sans-serif","serif"">Gian Paolo</span>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<image001.gif><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"sans-serif","serif"">
</span><image002.gif><o:p></o:p></p>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in">This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in">The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in">content is not permitted.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in">If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in">Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in">Please consider the environment before printing this email.<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></pre>
</div>
</div></blockquote><PRE>This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
</PRE></body></html>