<font size=2 face="sans-serif">Nestor,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> here
my cent.....</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">SLIDE #5: IS THE BOX AT THE
BOTTOM NEEDED ?</font><font size=3> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">If I remember well, in the first template
from Adrian that box was at the very beginning of each WG report.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">In that way one may guess if all the
rest of the WG report is going to be OK, CAUTION or PROBLEM.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">So my opinion in this respect is that
the slid eis nbot needed in the position shown on your slide #5, but it
could be a good preliminary summary if it is the very first item in the
slides produced by a given WG.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">If the box is retained we may want to
change the first column to be "WG name" (unless it is clear what
it should be written in that first cell) such that taking all inputs together
it is possible to build a summary table for the Area.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">SLIDE #5: PLANNING BOX</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I would change the heading of Column
2 to "List of document for <WG Name>"> such that each
row of the column can contain only the title.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">If you plan to buind a summary table
from individual tables that I would make the first two column top became
four as follows:</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">- WG name (e.g. SLS-RFM)</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">- CCSDS Doc Ref (e.g. 401.1-B)</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">- Activity (e.g. Red, Pink, Draft, Update)
to identifiy whether is a future Blue/Magenta Book, a future updated Blue/Magenta,
a future Green, a future updated Green</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">- Doc Title</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">For the Status I would rather define
a few keywords as<i> you never what people can invent when they have room
for free text</i> :o) Possible values con be OK, Caution, Problem,
Delayed (more?). As you see the first 3 values match the famous summary
box and the last one could mean delayed but no problem)</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">SLIDE #5: TYPO </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">See: </font><font size=2 face="Arial">•</font><font size=2 color=#ff22ff face="Arial"><b>rep[ort
to CESG</b></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">SLIDE #5: Recommendation </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I gues that Recommendation 2 Pages
per WG means that the contents suggested in this slide can be spread
in up to two slides and then the WG can add more ancillary slides for "big"
explanations.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">SLIDE #6: Area Projects </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">This slide will be of course duplicating
data included by each WG.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I may understand the suggestion for
such a duplication o get all the eggs together, but there is a risk for
errors during copy and paste</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">SLIDE #7: Title </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I would change from: </font><font size=2 color=#0000a1 face="Arial"><b>Xxx
Area: Resources Discussion </b></font><font size=2 color=#ff22ff face="Arial"><b>for
Approved Projects</b></font><font size=2> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">To: </font><font size=2 color=#0000a1 face="Arial"><b>Xxx
Area: Resources ISSUES </b></font><font size=2> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Rationale: 1) you want to highlight
issues not discussion. 2) The project is clearly approved since if there
were resource issues the project would have not been approved.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">SLIDE #8: Tables......
</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">As for the planning box, I think there
should be a table like this for each WG (i.e. add it to slide 5) such that
the summary table is created with copy and paste as for slide 6.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The same comments as for slide 6 apply.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">The same comments for the first column
as for the planning table apply.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">SLIDE #9: Again a duplication
</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">This slide will be of course duplicating
data included by each WG.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I may understand the suggestion for
such a duplication o get all the eggs together, but there is a risk for
errors during copy and paste</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Regards</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Gian Paolo</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Nestor.Peccia@esa.int</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"CCSDS Engineering
Steering Group - CESG Exec(cesg" <cesg@mailman.ccsds.org></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">05/07/2016 15:21</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">[CESG] New draft
of "CESG report to CMC"template</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Sent by:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"CESG"
<cesg-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org></font>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Dear all,</font><font size=3> <br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
Please find attached the next template iteration. I have highlighted the
changes in magenta color. I have tried to incorporate all comments, adding
also my views.</font><font size=3> <br>
<br>
<br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
Some clarifications:</font><font size=3> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">1. AD/DAD
will receive a WG / SANA / SIG / BOF report, which will in general
contain several charts. The assumption is that each WG Chair will be asked
to summarise its WG findings in 2 charts (1 chart for BOF / SIG ) as
described in chart # 5 of the template.AD / DAD can then copy / paste in
his Area report.</font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif"> IS THE
BOX AT THE BOTTOM NEEDED ?</font><font size=3> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">2. Charts
6 to 11 are Area dedicated info, as follows</font><font size=3> </font>
<ul>
<li><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Chart 6 is composed with the tables
given by each WG. It is simpler to add 1 Table after the other, than create
one Table. </font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">OPEN FOR DISCUSSION</font><font size=3>
</font>
<li><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Chart 7 shall only exist for approved
Projects with missing proto 2 resources (i.e. MOIMS and SIS). Once this
issue is solved for all these Projects, the chart will disappear.</font><font size=3>
</font>
<li><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Chart 8 is only for Draft projects to
be submitted in the next 6 months for CMC approval </font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">NOT
FOR ALL DRAFT PROJECTS (otherwise will be too long and useless for currently
64 ones)</font><font size=3> </font>
<li><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Chart 9 is Resolution Summary</font><font size=3>
</font>
<li><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Chart 10 is Issues Summary</font><font size=3>
</font>
<li><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Chart 11 is Area Executive Summary.
CESG Chair is using this chart to derive the CESG presentation to IOAG</font><font size=2 color=red face="sans-serif">.IT
IS A MUST TO HAVE IT </font></ul><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Please let
me have your views.asap</font><font size=3> <br>
</font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
ciao</font><font size=3> </font><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
nestor</font>
<br><tt><font size=3>This message and any attachments are intended for
the use of the addressee or addressees only.<br>
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole
or in part) of its<br>
content is not permitted.<br>
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete
it from your system.<br>
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.<br>
<br>
Please consider the environment before printing this email.<br>
[attachment "d02-CESG-Report-to-CMC-Fall 2016 Template.pptx"
deleted by Gian Paolo Calzolari/esoc/ESA] </font></tt><tt><font size=2>_______________________________________________<br>
CESG mailing list<br>
CESG@mailman.ccsds.org<br>
</font></tt><a href="https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg"><tt><font size=2>https://mailman.ccsds.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cesg</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2><br>
</font></tt>
<br>
<br><PRE>This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
</PRE>