<font size=2 face="sans-serif">Distribution limited to CESG, CMC not copied</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Peter,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"> you
may want to list the </font><font size=2 face="Calibri"><u>seven (7) identified
Type 2 “SIM” allocations that could be recovered </u></font><font size=2 face="sans-serif">at
once as an hint for CMC (an not only to CMC) to see what you are speaking
about and which agencies are affected.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">My cent......</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Gippo</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">From:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"Shames, Peter
M (312B)" <peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">To:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"CMC" <cmc@mailman.ccsds.org></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Cc:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">"CCSDS Engineering
Steering Group - CESG Exec" <cesg@mailman.ccsds.org></font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Date:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">19/04/2016 21:01</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Subject:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">[CESG] FW: Poll
rejected by CMC: CMC-P-2016-01-002</font>
<br><font size=1 color=#5f5f5f face="sans-serif">Sent by:
</font><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cesg-bounces@mailman.ccsds.org</font>
<br>
<hr noshade>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">Dear CMC,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">This is in reply to the CMC poll, CMC-P-2016-01-002,
that requested approval for the SANA to revover all of the SCIDs that are
assigned to simulators and other “flight-less birds”. The response
to this poll also made reference to other polls that addressed this same
topic, but from different perspectives. The initial poll was CMC-A-2015-11-02
which was sent out in November 2015, asking that the SANA inform the agencies
of the SCIDs that were assigned to Simulators and that the agencies reply
by 31 Jan 2016.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">The status of this topic was discussed
in the recent CESG meeting held in Cleveland on 11 April 2016. The
motivation for this action is that the number of unassigned Type 2 (AOS)
SCIDs that are now available for allocation is only two (2). Some
concrete action by the CCSDS member agencies must be taken now or we risk
not being able to support new space missions wishing to use the AOS protocol.
<b><i>Of course, this necessity to free up unused SCIDs must not
put operating missions at risk, but this same risk does not, and cannot,
be applied to simulators which do not get communicated to by RF radiation..</i></b></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">Here is the chronology of activities related
to this situation:</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"><b>CMC-A-2015-11-02 Request to return SIM
SCIDs</b></font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">"SANA was requested to circulate a
list, by agency, of the SCIDs that should be returned to SANA.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">CMC member agencies should provide a response
to SANA by 31 January 2016.”</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">1. </font><font size=2 face="Calibri">The
SANA circulated this request to each of the agencies.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">2. </font><font size=2 face="Calibri">Some
agencies have responded (one such response is at the end of this message).</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">3. </font><font size=2 face="Calibri">Not
all agencies responded to this request</font>
<br><font size=2><b>CMC-P-2015-12-003 Approval of Reclaiming Simulator
SCIDs from the Registry</b></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">1. </font><font size=2 face="Calibri">The
resolution was provisionally accepted</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">2. </font><font size=2 face="Calibri">CNES
and JAXA stated specific provisions asking for “time to resolve",
but with no defined completion date</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">3. </font><font size=2 face="Calibri">There
appears to have been no further action to close these provisions on behalf
of the agencies</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"><b>CMC-P-2016-01-002 Request approval of
SANA action to recover SCIDs assigned to simulators</b></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">1. </font><font size=2 face="Calibri">CNES
and ESA ask for additional time</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">2. </font><font size=2 face="Calibri">ESA
& CSA ask for a list of the spacecraft </font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">3. </font><font size=2 face="Calibri"><u>The
list of spacecraft was sent to each agency with the original request, back
in December 2015</u></font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">4. </font><font size=2 face="Calibri">There
is no agreed termination point provided, but extending the dealine to “end
of February” is proposed by ESA</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">5. </font><font size=2 face="Calibri">INPE
asks for a periodic (yearly) communique to the agencies re their assigned
SCIDs</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">It is now the middle of April 2016, well
past the “end of February” date that was proposed by ESA. No other
agency proposed a closure date. The CESG discussed this topic on
11 April 2016. This is the analysis provided by SEA and concurred
by the CESG:</font>
<ul>
<li><font size=2 face="Calibri">By definition any simulator or “flight-less
bird” is never communicated to using free space RF radiation.</font>
<li><font size=2 face="Calibri">The whole purpose of SCID assignment is
to provide a unique CCSDS identifier so that there is no mistake when sending
data to S/C using RF radiation.</font>
<li><font size=2 face="Calibri">Unless these rules are violated there is
no possibility of ambiguity if the SCIDs for simulators or “flight-less
birds” are recovered and re-assigned.</font>
<li><font size=2 face="Calibri">In practical terms, the agencies may continue
using the current SCIDs, or any other SCIDs that they wish to select, for
simulators or “flight-less birds”, as long as they do not radiate them.</font>
<li><font size=2 face="Calibri">Managing these “SIM SCIDs” is then purely
an agency matter.</font>
<li>
<li><font size=2 face="Calibri">Agencies have been notoriously slow (or
un-responsive) in responding to requests for feedback or returning OIDs</font>
<li><font size=2 face="Calibri"><u>By count there are seven (7) identified
Type 2 “SIM” allocations that could be recovered now</u></font>
<li>
<li><font size=2 face="Calibri">There is no technical reason to delay this
further, especially since there are only two (2) unassigned Type 2 SCIDs
remaining.</font></ul><font size=2 face="Calibri">It is already four (4)
months since the original request was made and it is one and one half months
past the end of February date proposed by ESA. Since agencies may
continue to use the SCIDs for their simulators, without risk of any kind,
there is really no technical reason why this action to recover these SCIDs
and make them available for assignment to real spacecraft should not be
done immediately. </font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">In order to avoid the very real possibility
of running out of Type 2 SCIDs for assignment to real, operating, spacecraft
the CESG requests that the CMC concur with this request CMC-P-2016-01-002.
</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">If the CMC insists that still more time
is needed then the following is proposed:</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">1. </font><font size=2 face="Calibri">The
SANA be instructed to again send out to each agency, the list of SCIDs
that they have assigned for simulators and flightless birds</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">2. </font><font size=2 face="Calibri">The
agencies be given <b><i>one month more</i></b>, from the time that these
lists are sent out, to coordinate with their missions</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">3. </font><font size=2 face="Calibri">At
the end of this time that the SANA take the action to recover these SCIDs,
place them at the end of the list as is the current practice, and make
them available for re-assigment to new spacecraft</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">Respectfully, Peter Shames (for the CESG)</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=3 face="Calibri"><b>From: </b>Nestor Peccia <</font><a href=mailto:Nestor.Peccia@esa.int><font size=3 color=blue face="Calibri"><u>Nestor.Peccia@esa.int</u></font></a><font size=3 face="Calibri">><b><br>
Date: </b>Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 9:48 AM<b><br>
To: </b>Peter Shames <</font><a href=mailto:peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov><font size=3 color=blue face="Calibri"><u>peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov</u></font></a><font size=3 face="Calibri">><b><br>
Subject: </b>Poll rejected by CMC</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3 face="Calibri">Peter <br>
please action accordingly <br>
ciao <br>
nestor <br>
---------------------<br>
CMC E-Poll Identifier: CMC-P-2016-01-002<br>
Request approval of SANA action to recover SCIDs assigned to simulators<br>
<br>
Results of CMC poll beginning 5 January 2016 and ending 31 January 2016:<br>
<br>
ADOPT: 5 (55.55%) (CNSA, DLR, FSA, JAXA, NASA)<br>
ADOPT PROVISIONALLY: 3 (33.33%) (CSA, ESA, INPE) <br>
REJECT: 0 (0%)<br>
REJECT WITH COMMENTS: 1 (11.11%) (CNES)<br>
<br>
Results are based on responses from 9 out of 11 members (81.81%).<br>
<br>
No response was received from the following Agencies:<br>
<br>
ASI<br>
CSA<br>
<br>
RESPONCES<br>
<br>
CNES (REJECT WITH COMMENTS) - The timeout is too short ; conditions
stated in the previous CMC-P-2015-12-003 have not been disposed nor taken
into account in this new poll.
<br>
<br>
CSA (ADOPT PROVISIONALLY) - It would be a good idea to get a list of SCIDs
assigned to simulators per agency to make a last verification with our
users before adopting this resolution.
<br>
<br>
ESA (ADOPT PROVISIONALLY) - It would be advisable to try and close action
CMC-A-2015-11-02 and subsequent Agency responses if it has not happened
so far. <br>
I do not recall ESA having been informed of the SCIDs that are assigned
to simulators. <br>
I suggest to extend the deadline for the Agencies to relinquish the SCIDs
assigned to simulators by end of February 2016<br>
<br>
INPE (ADOPT PROVISIONALLY) - It would be advisable that SANA may send,
possibly on an yearly basis,in separate, to each of the AGENCIES and ORGANIZATIONS
representatives, an appropriate summary of the SCIDs which are assigned
to each of them, for their verification and, under a deadline, response
to the SANA Authority, reconfirming and or rectifying any existing assignment.<br>
<br>
Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Rejected<br>
Inferred Secretariat Action: Poll was rejected. Inform Peter Shames<br>
<br>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *</font><font size=2 face="Calibri">
</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Calibri">This message and any attachments are intended
for the use of the addressee or addressees only.<br>
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole
or in part) of its<br>
content is not permitted.<br>
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete
it from your system.<br>
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.<br>
<br>
Please consider the environment before printing this email.</font>
<br><font size=2><b>=======================================================================================================</b></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2>CMC E-Poll Identifier: <b>CMC-P-2015-12-003 Approval of
Reclaiming Simulator SCIDs from the Registry</b><br>
<br>
Results of CMC poll beginning 08 December 2015 and ending 22 December 2015:<br>
<br>
Adopt: 7 (77.77%)
(CNSA, DLR, ESA, INPE, NASA, UKSA)<br>
Adopt Provisionally: 2 (33.33%) (CNES,
JAXA)<br>
Reject: 0 (0%)<br>
Reject with Comments:
0 (0%)<br>
<br>
Results are based on responses from 9 out of 11 members (81.81%).</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2><br>
No response was received from the following Agencies:<br>
<br>
ASI<br>
FSA</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2>Provisions</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2>CNES - agrees on the following: <br>
- the first action should be for all agencies to return the unused codes
as it is obvious there are many (SC no longer in operations) ; this is
considered the most efficient action to recover SCIds. <br>
- no SCId should be allocated to simulators from now. <br>
CNES agrees on the principle but will put a condition on the assigned GSCIds
for simulators: <br>
- when the list of those affected is provided by SANA, some time is needed
to run a coordination with the projects and SANA should only remove these
SCIds when the Agency representative will confirm agreement. <br>
- as simulators are mainly version 1 SCIds, with more margins for new allocation,
the additional delay is estimated acceptable ; however, CNES will first
process the version 2 Ids, if any.<br>
<br>
JAXA - agrees on the resolution. However, coordination on reclaiming SCIDs
which have been assigned for satellites under development take sometime,
and this circumstance should be taken into account.<br>
<br>
Secretariat Interpretation of Results: Adopted Provisionally<br>
Resulting CMC Resolution:
CMC-R-2015-12-009<br>
Inferred Secretariat Action:
Once Provisions Met, SANA Reclaim Simulator SCIDs.</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2><b>=======================================================================================================</b></font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"><br>
</font>
<br><font size=3 face="Calibri"><b>From: </b>"</font><a href=mailto:osvaldo.peinado@dlr.de><font size=3 color=#800080 face="Calibri"><u>osvaldo.peinado@dlr.de</u></font></a><font size=3 face="Calibri">"
<</font><a href=mailto:osvaldo.peinado@dlr.de><font size=3 color=#800080 face="Calibri"><u>osvaldo.peinado@dlr.de</u></font></a><font size=3 face="Calibri">><b><br>
Date: </b>Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 6:32 AM<b><br>
To: </b>"</font><a href=mailto:info@sanaregistry.org><font size=3 color=#800080 face="Calibri"><u>info@sanaregistry.org</u></font></a><font size=3 face="Calibri">"
<</font><a href=mailto:info@sanaregistry.org><font size=3 color=#800080 face="Calibri"><u>info@sanaregistry.org</u></font></a><font size=3 face="Calibri">><b><br>
Cc: </b>Peter Shames <</font><a href=mailto:peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov><font size=3 color=#800080 face="Calibri"><u>peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov</u></font></a><font size=3 face="Calibri">><b><br>
Subject: </b>AW: [SANA #8630] Request to return SIM SCIDs (CMC-A-2015-11-02)</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">Dear all</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">At the moment I can confirm that the </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<p>
<table width=641 style="border-collapse:collapse;">
<tr height=8>
<td width=61 bgcolor=#f3f3f3 style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"><b>Version</b></font></div>
<td width=43 bgcolor=#f3f3f3 style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"><b>SCID</b></font></div>
<td width=92 bgcolor=#f3f3f3 style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"><b>Name</b></font></div>
<td width=32 bgcolor=#f3f3f3 style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"><b>SIM</b></font></div>
<td width=81 bgcolor=#f3f3f3 style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"><b>TC</b></font></div>
<td width=81 bgcolor=#f3f3f3 style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"><b>TC</b></font></div>
<td width=159 bgcolor=#f3f3f3 style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"><b>Note</b></font></div>
<td width=81 bgcolor=#f3f3f3 style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"><b>Date</b></font></div>
<tr height=8>
<td width=61 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"> </font></div>
<td width=43 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"> </font></div>
<td width=92 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"> </font></div>
<td width=32 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"> </font></div>
<td width=81 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"> </font></div>
<td width=81 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"> </font></div>
<td width=159 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"> </font></div>
<td width=81 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif"> </font></div>
<tr height=8>
<td width=61 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif">1</font></div>
<td width=43 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif">2B5</font></div>
<td width=92 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif">GRACE-FO
-sim</font></div>
<td width=32 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif">True</font></div>
<td width=81 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif">2211.0 MHz
(A), 2260.8 MHz (B)</font></div>
<td width=81 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif">2211.0 MHz
(A), 2260.8 MHz (B)</font></div>
<td width=159 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif">GRACE-FO-sim.
(GRACE FOLLOW-ON) A and B</font></div>
<td width=81 bgcolor=#fafafa style="border-style:solid solid solid solid;border-color:#CCCCCC;border-width:1px 1px 1px 1px;padding:0px 0px;">
<div align=center><font size=3 color=#2f2f2f face="sans-serif">2013-02-25</font></div></table>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">Can be give back, for the others project,
I´m waiting for an answer, but during this time of the year will be very
difficult</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">I guess beginning of next year we will
have a confirmation</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">I wish you Merry Christmas</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">Osvaldo</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----<br>
Von: Space Assigned Numbers Authority [</font><a href=mailto:info@sanaregistry.org><font size=2 color=#800080 face="Calibri"><u>mailto:info@sanaregistry.org</u></font></a><font size=2 face="Calibri">]
<br>
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Dezember 2015 17:34<br>
An: Peinado, Osvaldo Luis<br>
Cc: Space Assigned Numbers Authority<br>
Betreff: [SANA #8630] Request to return SIM SCIDs (CMC-A-2015-11-02)</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">Dear Agency Representative,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">Following the CMC resolution CMC-A-2015-11-02:</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">"SANA was requested to circulate a
list, by agency, of the SCIDs that should be returned to SANA.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">CMC member agencies should provide a response
to SANA by 31 January 2016."</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">You will find attached the candidate list
of SIM SCIDs found for your agency. Please confirm they</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">are indeed used for simulation and that
they can be returned.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">To relinquish, please provide then following
information by email at </font><a href=mailto:info@sanaregistry.org><font size=2 color=#800080 face="Calibri">info@sanaregistry.org</font></a><font size=2 face="Calibri">:</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">- SCID</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">- Version</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">- Spacecraft Name</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">- Channel(s)</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">- Frequencies</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">- Contact information (Name and affiliation)
of the requester</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">Note the following context about the sim
SCIDs:</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">* This same request is being made of all
agencies who have requested SCIDs for simulators and other</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">“flight-less birds"</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">* The CMC intends for all of these simulator
Ids to be returned to the pool of SCIDs available for</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">assignment for active mission communications</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">* Please relinquish these SCIDs, using
the normal mechanisms defined in CCSDS 320.0-B-6, no later</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">than 31 January 2016</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">* Agencies may, within their own ground
networks, continue to use these same numbers for their own</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">purposes</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">Thank you.</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri"> </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">-- </font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">Best regards,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">Audric Schiltknecht</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Calibri">Space Assigned Numbers Authority</font><tt><font size=2>_______________________________________________<br>
CESG mailing list<br>
CESG@mailman.ccsds.org<br>
</font></tt><a href=http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg><tt><font size=2>http://mailman.ccsds.org/mailman/listinfo/cesg</font></tt></a><tt><font size=2><br>
</font></tt>
<br>
<br><PRE>This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only.
The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its
content is not permitted.
If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system.
Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
</PRE>