<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
CESG E-Poll Identifier: <b class="">CESG-P-2015-04-001 Creation the MOIMS Mission Planning and Scheduling WG</b>
<div class=""><b class=""><br class="">
</b>
<div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
<div style="margin: 0px;" class="">Results of CESG poll beginning 09 April 2015 and ending 23 April 2015:</div>
<div style="margin: 0px; min-height: 14px;" class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div style="margin: 0px;" class="">Abstain: 0 (0%) </div>
<div style="margin: 0px;" class="">Approve Unconditionally: 7 (87.5%) (Barkley, Merri, Behal, de Cola, Calzolari, Suess, Barton)</div>
<div style="margin: 0px;" class="">Approve with Conditions: 1 (12.5%) (Shames)</div>
<div style="margin: 0px;" class="">Disapprove with Comment: 0 (0%)</div>
<div style="margin: 0px; min-height: 14px;" class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div style="margin: 0px;" class="">CONDITIONS/COMMENTS:</div>
<div style="margin: 0px;" class="">Barkley - A comment: the goals section of the charter ends mid-sentence as presented for the poll. My assumption is that the goals, to be consistent with the stated scoping of "...The submission of Planning Requests (input
to Mission Planning) • The distribution of Plans/Schedules (output of Mission Planning)..." will include blue books specifications for these two items.</div>
<div style="margin: 0px;" class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div style="margin: 0px;" class="">Shames - I have two concerns about this WG, as stated in the charter and white paper: </div>
1) The focus in most of these materials seems to be on SM&C and how it can solve the problem, rather than on Mission Planning and a clear presentation of what they need. This is both "cart before the horse" and looks like an overly tight binding that may be
detrimental to the overall usability of the resulting standards. <br class="">
2) The WG leadership is exclusively Euro-centric. Since there does appear to be a significant North American interest in this it would be sensible to broaden the coverage to recognize that.
<div style="margin: 0px;" class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div style="margin: 0px;" class="">Total Respondents: 8</div>
<div style="margin: 0px; min-height: 14px;" class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div style="margin: 0px;" class="">No response was received from the following Area(s):</div>
<div style="margin: 0px; min-height: 14px;" class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div style="margin: 0px;" class="">SECRETARIAT INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS: Approved with Conditions </div>
<div style="margin: 0px;" class="">PROPOSED SECRETARIAT ACTION: Once Conditions are met start CMC Poll </div>
<div style="margin: 0px; min-height: 14px;" class=""><br class="">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>