<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta name="ProgId" content="PowerPoint.Slide">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft PowerPoint 14">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>Hi Keith,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I suspect that this is just an error and that we can easily fix it now. In the current SANA YB (CCSDS 313x0y1) it says that one of the four possible registration rules is this:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><!--StartFragment-->
<p style="line-height: 80%; margin-top: 1.92pt; margin-bottom: 1.92pt; margin-left: 0.76in; text-indent: 0in; direction: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: Arial; font-weight: bold;">b) Change requires
</span><u><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: Arial; font-weight: bold;">an engineering review by a designated
</span></u><u><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: Arial; font-weight: bold;">expert
</span></u><u><span style="font-size:16.0pt;font-family:Arial;mso-ascii-font-family:
Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:"?? ?????";mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
color:blue;language:en-US;font-weight:bold;mso-style-textfill-type:solid;
mso-style-textfill-fill-color:blue;mso-style-textfill-fill-alpha:100.0%">(or
group)</span></u><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: Arial; font-weight: bold;">.
</span><span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: Arial; font-weight: bold;">The expert for </span></p>
<p style="line-height: 80%; margin-top: 1.92pt; margin-bottom: 1.92pt; margin-left: 0.76in; text-indent: 0in; direction: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: Arial; font-weight: bold;"><br>
</span></p>
<p style="line-height: 80%; margin-top: 1.92pt; margin-bottom: 1.92pt; margin-left: 0.76in; text-indent: 0in; direction: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: Arial; font-weight: bold;">that registry is assigned by the CESG based on the WG recommendation.</span></p>
<p style="line-height: 80%; margin-top: 1.92pt; margin-bottom: 1.92pt; margin-left: 0.76in; text-indent: 0in; direction: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed; vertical-align: baseline;">
<span style="font-size: 16pt; font-family: Arial; font-weight: bold;"> </span></p>
<!--EndFragment--></div>
<div>Since the WG that created this registry is not active that "expert" would naturally default to the Area that the WG was in. I think we can safely declare the SIS AD as the "expert" in this case and that doing so breaks no rules nor does it set a precedent
that we (the CESG) did not already agree with, in principle, during discussion on Monday, 30 March.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>For those just tuning into this discussion, this type of registry rule is the only one that requires an expert review, the other three options use different rules, thus do not require a "review authority". This is already in the SANA YB, but some further
clean-ups and extensions were proposed and will be reviewed by the CESG in the coming months.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards, Peter</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><Scott>, Keith Scott <<a href="mailto:kscott@mitre.org">kscott@mitre.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 8:47 AM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Peter Shames <<a href="mailto:peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov">peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov</a>>, CCSDS Secretariat <<a href="mailto:secretariat@mailman.ccsds.org">secretariat@mailman.ccsds.org</a>>, CCSDS Engineering Steering
Group - CESG All <<a href="mailto:cesg-all@mailman.ccsds.org">cesg-all@mailman.ccsds.org</a>>, Greg Kazz <<a href="mailto:Greg.J.Kazz@jpl.nasa.gov">Greg.J.Kazz@jpl.nasa.gov</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>RE: [Cesg-all] RE: Why is SLS-SLP the Review Authority for the SCPS-TP Extended Capability Binding Space Identifiers?<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE" style="BORDER-LEFT: #b5c4df 5 solid; PADDING:0 0 0 5; MARGIN:0 0 0 5;">
<div xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#44546A;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#44546A;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#44546A">I don’t object. If you think it would make more sense, we could wait until after the yellow book updates so that the SIS Area can be a ‘valid’ review authority.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#44546A"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#44546A"> --keith<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#44546A"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b>From:</b> Shames, Peter M (312B) [<a href="mailto:peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov">mailto:peter.m.shames@jpl.nasa.gov</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, April 01, 2015 11:46 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Scott, Keith L.; <a href="mailto:Secretariat@mailman.ccsds.org">Secretariat@mailman.ccsds.org</a>; CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG All (<a href="mailto:cesg-all@mailman.ccsds.org">cesg-all@mailman.ccsds.org</a>); Kazz, Greg J (312B)<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Cesg-all] RE: Why is SLS-SLP the Review Authority for the SCPS-TP Extended Capability Binding Space Identifiers?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black">Keith,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black">I agree that the SIS area should be the Review Authority for all of these SCPS registries. I'll ask the SANA and the SSG to review and recommend the change unless anyone
has an objection.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><i><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:red">Are there any objections or issues with this?</span></i></b><span style="font-size:10.5pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black">Thanks, Peter<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><span style="color:black">From: </span>
</b><span style="color:black"><Scott>, Keith Scott <<a href="mailto:kscott@mitre.org">kscott@mitre.org</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Monday, March 30, 2015 at 4:20 PM<br>
<b>To: </b>CCSDS Secretariat <<a href="mailto:secretariat@mailman.ccsds.org">secretariat@mailman.ccsds.org</a>>, CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG All <<a href="mailto:cesg-all@mailman.ccsds.org">cesg-all@mailman.ccsds.org</a>>, Greg Kazz <<a href="mailto:Greg.J.Kazz@jpl.nasa.gov">Greg.J.Kazz@jpl.nasa.gov</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[Cesg-all] RE: Why is SLS-SLP the Review Authority for the SCPS-TP Extended Capability Binding Space Identifiers?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:10.5pt;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #B5C4DF 4.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-right:0in" id="MAC_OUTLOOK_ATTRIBUTION_BLOCKQUOTE">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#44546A">Seems to be the same for all the SCPS registries. Maybe because SLS-SLP is an extant WG?</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#44546A"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#44546A"> --keith</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:#44546A"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in"><b><span style="color:black">From:</span></b><span style="color:black"> Scott, Keith L.
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, March 30, 2015 4:20 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:Secretariat@mailman.ccsds.org">Secretariat@mailman.ccsds.org</a>; CCSDS Engineering Steering Group - CESG All (<a href="mailto:cesg-all@mailman.ccsds.org">cesg-all@mailman.ccsds.org</a>);
<a href="mailto:greg.j.kazz@jpl.nasa.gov">greg.j.kazz@jpl.nasa.gov</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Why is SLS-SLP the Review Authority for the SCPS-TP Extended Capability Binding Space Identifiers?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in"><span style="color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:black">Shouldn’t the review authority for
<a href="http://sanaregistry.org/r/scps_tp_extended_capability_id/scps_tp_extended_capability_id.html">
http://sanaregistry.org/r/scps_tp_extended_capability_id/scps_tp_extended_capability_id.html</a></span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:black"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:black">Be the SIS area, not SLS-SLP?</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:black"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:black"> --keith</span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0in"><span style="font-size:14.0pt;color:black"> </span><span style="color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</span>
</body>
</html>